Literature DB >> 9090799

Confirming testosterone administration by isotope ratio mass spectrometric analysis of urinary androstanediols.

C H Shackleton1, A Phillips, T Chang, Y Li.   

Abstract

A gas chromatographic combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometric (GC/C/IRMS) method was used for studying the incorporation of exogenous testosterone enanthate into excreted urinary 5 alpha- and 5 beta-androstane-3 alpha, 17 beta-diols. A multistep but straightforward work-up procedure produced a simple GC chromatogram of urinary steroid acetates composed principally of two androstanediols and pregnanediol. It is anticipated that such a method may form the basis of a doping control test for testosterone that could be used as a primary method during major sporting events or alternatively as a verification technique. Urine samples from five individuals were collected before and after administration of testosterone enanthate (250 mg). The delta 13C0/1000 value of andro-stanediols was around -26 to -28 during the baseline period and decreased to about -29 to -30 in the days following synthetic testosterone administration. One of the other major steroids in the chromatogram, pregnanediol, was utilized as the "internal standard," because its delta 13C0/1000 values did not markedly change following testosterone administration, remaining at -25 to -27. In all subjects studied, the delta 13C0/1000 values for androstanediols were reduced sufficiently over 8 days to confirm administration of synthetic testosterone. Although steroids isolated from urine of normal individuals from 12 different countries gave values between -24 and -28, this seemed not to be related to nationality or region. The most likely variable is the proportion of plants with low and high carbon 13 content in the diet. This variable is likely to be more affected by individual food preferences than broad ethnic food divisions. In this paper, we propose a ratio of delta 13C0/1000 for androstanediols to pregnanediol as a useful discriminant of testosterone misuse, a value above 1.1:1.0 being indicative of such misuse. The work-up procedure was designed for batch analysis and to use only simple techniques, rather than employ further instrumentation, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), in purifying steroids for GC/C/IRMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9090799     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-128x(96)00253-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Steroids        ISSN: 0039-128X            Impact factor:   2.668


  8 in total

1.  The future of doping control in athletes. Issues related to blood sampling.

Authors:  K I Birkeland; P Hemmersbach
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Urine nandrolone metabolites: false positive doping test?

Authors:  R M N Kohler; M I Lambert
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Testosterone and doping control.

Authors:  C Saudan; N Baume; N Robinson; L Avois; P Mangin; M Saugy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Prostate formation in a marsupial is mediated by the testicular androgen 5 alpha-androstane-3 alpha,17 beta-diol.

Authors:  G Shaw; M B Renfree; M W Leihy; C H Shackleton; E Roitman; J D Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Anabolic steroid use: patterns of use and detection of doping.

Authors:  Michael R Graham; Bruce Davies; Fergal M Grace; Andrew Kicman; Julien S Baker
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for the action of testosterone on human skeletal muscle. A basis for illegal performance enhancement.

Authors:  F Kadi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Confounding factors and genetic polymorphism in the evaluation of individual steroid profiling.

Authors:  Tiia Kuuranne; Martial Saugy; Norbert Baume
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Intracrine androgen biosynthesis, metabolism and action revisited.

Authors:  Lina Schiffer; Wiebke Arlt; Karl-Heinz Storbeck
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.