Literature DB >> 9090521

Legibility and completeness of physicians' handwritten medication orders.

E H Winslow1, V A Nestor, S K Davidoff, P G Thompson, J C Borum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess handwritten medication orders for legibility and completeness, legibility of physician signatures, and presence of date and time the orders were written.
DESIGN: Descriptive.
SETTING: Three patient care units in one hospital in Texas. SAMPLE: One hundred seventy-six medication orders and 55 signatures by 36 different physicians for 39 patients.
METHODS: Six experienced nurses evaluated medication orders and signatures for legibility using a rating scale developed for the study. Completeness of medication orders and presence of date and time were determined.
RESULTS: Twenty percent [corrected] of the medication orders and 78% of the signatures were illegible or legible with effort. Twenty-four percent of the medication orders were incomplete. Date was omitted on 18% of the medication orders, and time was missing on 58%.
CONCLUSION: Difficult-to-read and incomplete medication orders continue to be an important system problem that can increase risk for medication errors and patient harm. Good penmanship and complete orders are unrealistic goals without system support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9090521     DOI: 10.1016/s0147-9563(97)90076-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  22 in total

1.  Extending the VA CPRS electronic patient record order entry system using natural language processing techniques.

Authors:  C Lovis; T H Payne
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Evaluation of a command-line parser-based order entry pathway for the Department of Veterans Affairs electronic patient record.

Authors:  C Lovis; M K Chapko; D P Martin; T H Payne; R H Baud; P J Hoey; S D Fihn
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  A conceptual framework for evaluating outpatient electronic prescribing systems based on their functional capabilities.

Authors:  Douglas S Bell; Shan Cretin; Richard S Marken; Adam B Landman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Prescription audit adjunct to rational pharmacotherapy education improves prescribing skills of medical students.

Authors:  Ahmet Akici; M Zafer Gören; Cenk Aypak; Berna Terzioğlu; Sule Oktay
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Effect of computerisation on the quality and safety of chemotherapy prescription.

Authors:  Marc Voeffray; André Pannatier; Roger Stupp; Nadia Fucina; Serge Leyvraz; Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

6.  Medication errors among inpatients.

Authors:  Devendra Mishra; Shambhavi Seth
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Analysis and detection of dental prescribing errors at primary health care units in Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana M D Mendonça; Divaldo Pereira Lyra; Juliana S Rabelo; Jullyana S Siqueira; Blicie J Balisa-Rocha; Fernanda R E Gimenes; Leonardo R Bonjardim
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2009-10-30

Review 8.  Preventing medication errors in neonatology: Is it a dream?

Authors:  Roberto Antonucci; Annalisa Porcella
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-08

9.  Improving communication between hospital and community physicians. Feasibility study of a handwritten, faxed hospital discharge summary. Discharge Summary Study Group.

Authors:  J M Paterson; R L Allega
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Inpatient prescribing systems used in NHS Acute Trusts across England: a managerial perspective.

Authors:  Katherine Shemilt; Charles W Morecroft; James L Ford; Adam J Mackridge; Christopher Green
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.