Literature DB >> 9090280

Observer error and birthweight: digit preference in recording.

L Edouard1, A Senthilselvan.   

Abstract

We investigated the presence of digit preference in the recording of birthweight by a retrospective analysis of an official dataset of birth registrations. All births occurring in the Province of Saskatchewan in Canada from 1981 to 1991, but excluding 1988, were considered for this analysis. Preference for the terminal digit 0 increased progressively with increasing birthweight over the whole range of birthweights. Correction for digit preference led to an increase of 1.8% in the number of low birthweight babies and a concomitant increase of 0.1% in the actual incidence of low birthweight. Epidemiological applications of birthweight should take into account the observer error caused by digit preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9090280     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(97)90004-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  10 in total

1.  Are these emergency department performance data real?

Authors:  T E Locker; S M Mason
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Are anesthesia start and end times randomly distributed? The influence of electronic records.

Authors:  Litisha G Deal; Michael E Nyland; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Patrick Tighe
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 9.452

3.  Measuring birth weight in developing countries: does the method of reporting in retrospective surveys matter?

Authors:  Andrew A R Channon; Sabu S Padmadas; John W McDonald
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-01

4.  Examining the link between women's exposure to stressful life events prior to conception and infant and toddler health: the role of birth weight.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Hyojun Park; Lauren E Wisk; Kara C Mandell; Fathima Wakeel; Kristin Litzelman; Debanjana Chatterjee; Whitney P Witt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers.

Authors:  Emili García-Berthou; Carles Alcaraz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Rounding of birth weights in a neonatal intensive care unit over 20 years: an analysis of a large cohort study.

Authors:  Anthony J Emmerson; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Quality of age data in the Sierra Leone Ebola database.

Authors:  Lindsay Shively Womack; Charles Alpren; Frederick Martineau; Amara Jambai; Tushar Singh; Reinhard Kaiser; John Terrell Redd
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-04-07

8.  Birthweight measurement processes and perceived value: qualitative research in one EN-BIRTH study hospital in Tanzania.

Authors:  Miriam E Gladstone; Nahya Salim; Karama Ogillo; Donat Shamba; Georgia R Gore-Langton; Louise T Day; Hannah Blencowe; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Birthweight: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.

Authors:  Stefanie Kong; Louise T Day; Hannah Blencowe; Joy E Lawn; Sojib Bin Zaman; Kimberly Peven; Nahya Salim; Avinash K Sunny; Donat Shamba; Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman; Ashish K C; Harriet Ruysen; Shams El Arifeen; Paul Mee; Miriam E Gladstone
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Reporting errors, incidence and risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage and progression to severe PPH: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  A Briley; P T Seed; G Tydeman; H Ballard; M Waterstone; J Sandall; L Poston; R M Tribe; S Bewley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.531

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.