Literature DB >> 9089845

Discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of opioids with mu and kappa activity: data from laboratory animals and human subjects.

L A Dykstra1, K L Preston, G E Bigelow.   

Abstract

Although a large and rich body of data is available regarding the discriminative stimulus effects of opioids in laboratory animals and human subjects, it has been difficult to reconcile the data obtained from these two different sources. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to bring together data from both animal and human laboratories and systematically to compare the discriminative stimulus effects of opioids, in particular those with activity at both mu and kappa opioid receptor types (i.e., the mixed action opioids). The data that can be collected from laboratory animals differ from the data that can be collected in human subjects. In general, the advantage of studies in laboratory animals is that they can investigate very broad dose ranges of opioids as well as some very selective opioids that are not available for investigation in human subjects. Although investigations in human subjects are limited by the compounds and doses available for examination, the advantage of these studies is that they can examine the subjective as well as the discriminative stimulus effects of opioids. Taken together, studies conducted in laboratory animals and human subjects indicate that the mixed action opioids are best classified as intermediate efficacy mu agonists with additional activity through other non-mu, possibly kappa opioid systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9089845     DOI: 10.1007/s002130050208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

1.  Pain imaging in the emerging era of molecular medicine.

Authors:  Christian S Stohler; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

2.  The κ-opioid receptor gene as a predictor of response in a cocaine vaccine clinical trial.

Authors:  David A Nielsen; Sara C Hamon; Thomas R Kosten
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.458

3.  Fischer rats are more sensitive than Lewis rats to the suppressive effects of morphine and the aversive kappa-opioid agonist spiradoline.

Authors:  Christopher S Freet; Robert A Wheeler; Ellen Leuenberger; Nicole A S Mosblech; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Regulation of cocaine-induced reinstatement by group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in the ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  Lianyi Lu; Yueqiang Xue; Jeffery D Steketee; George V Rebec; Wenlin Sun
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  A within-subject assessment of the discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects of self-administered cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Jennifer L Martelle; Michael A Nader
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Patterns of nicotinic receptor antagonism: nicotine discrimination studies.

Authors:  Emily M Jutkiewicz; Emily A Brooks; Adam D Kynaston; Kenner C Rice; James H Woods
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  The stimulus properties of LSD in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  J C Winter; A K Kieres; M D Zimmerman; C J Reissig; J R Eckler; T Ullrich; K C Rice; R A Rabin; J B Richards
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 8.  The role of progestins in the behavioral effects of cocaine and other drugs of abuse: human and animal research.

Authors:  Justin J Anker; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  μ-Opioid receptor coupling to Gα(o) plays an important role in opioid antinociception.

Authors:  Jennifer T Lamberts; Emily M Jutkiewicz; Richard M Mortensen; John R Traynor
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Route of administration influences substitution patterns in rats trained to discriminate methadone vs. vehicle.

Authors:  Robert E Vann; Laura E Wise; Stephen A Varvel; Scott D Philibin; D Matthew Walentiny; Joseph H Porter
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.