Literature DB >> 9088603

Nickel-titanium coil springs and repelling magnets: a comparison of two different intra-oral molar distalization techniques.

N Erverdi1, O Koyutürk, N Küçükkeles.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare two intra-oral molar distalization procedures, involving 15 cases with Class II molar relationships. Magnetic devices were applied to the upper right first molars in each case, while nickel-titanium coil springs were used against the upper left first molars, for a period of 3 months. Measurements were made from lateral cephalograms and from photocopies of models taken before and after the distalization procedure. Although upper molar distalization was achieved with ease in both techniques, nickel-titanium coil springs were found to be the more effective in terms of movement achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9088603     DOI: 10.1093/ortho/24.1.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Orthod        ISSN: 0301-228X


  2 in total

1.  Maxillary molar distalization with miniscrew-supported appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review.

Authors:  Roshan Noor Mohamed; Sakeenabi Basha; Yousef Al-Thomali
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Comparison of transverse dental changes induced by the palatally applied Frog appliance and buccally applied Karad's integrated distalizing system.

Authors:  Fatma Deniz Uzuner; Emine Kaygisiz; Fatih Unver; Tuba Tortop
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.372

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.