Literature DB >> 9088342

Phenotypic heterogeneity in nucleotide excision repair mutants of rodent complementation groups 1 and 4.

D B Busch1, H van Vuuren, J de Wit, A Collins, M Z Zdzienicka, D L Mitchell, K W Brookman, M Stefanini, R Riboni, L H Thompson, R B Albert, A J van Gool, J Hoeijmakers.   

Abstract

Rodent ultraviolet light (UV)-sensitive mutant cells in complementation groups (CGs) 1 and 4 normally are known for their extraordinary (approximately 80-100 x) sensitivity to mitomycin C (MMC), although some CG1 mutants with reduced MMC sensitivity were previously reported (Stefanini et al. (1987) Cytotechnology 1, 91). We report here new CG1 and CG4 mutants with only 1.6-10 x wild-type MMC sensitivity despite low unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) levels. Mutant UV140, in UV CG4, has approximately 3.8 x the UV sensitivity of parental line AA8, approximately 1.6 x wild-type MMC sensitivity, wild-type X-ray and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) sensitivity, and is only slightly (approximately 1.4 x) hypermutable to 8-azaadenine resistance by UV light. It has moderately decreased incision of UV-damaged DNA, has moderately decreased removal of (6-4) photoproducts, and is profoundly deficient in UDS after UV. After UV, it shows abnormally decreased DNA synthesis and persistently decreased RNA synthesis. In addition a cell-free extract of this mutant displays strongly reduced nucleotide excision repair synthesis using DNA treated with N-acetoxy-acetyl-amino-fluorene (AAF). The extract selectively fails to complement extracts of group 1 and 4 mutants consistent with the notion that the affected proteins, ERCC1 and ERCC4, are part of the same complex and that mutations in one subunit also affect the other component. Mutant UV212 is a CG1 mutant with approximately 3.3 x wild-type UV and approximately 5-10 x wild-type MMC sensitivity, with profoundly deficient UDS and hypermutability (approximately 5.8 x) by UV. Mutant UV201, probably in CG1, is only slightly (approximately 1.5 x) UV-sensitive and has near wild-type (1.02X) UV mutability. These unusual group 1 and 4 mutants demonstrate that the unique UV and MMC sensitivity phenotypes displayed by these groups can be separated and support the idea that they are the result of distinct repair functions of the corresponding ERCC1 and ERCC4 genes: nucleotide excision repair for UV lesions and a separate repair pathway for removal of interstrand crosslinks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9088342     DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8777(96)00048-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  12 in total

1.  Differential processing of UV mimetic and interstrand crosslink damage by XPF cell extracts.

Authors:  N Zhang; X Zhang; C Peterson; L Li; R Legerski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Crystal structure and DNA binding functions of ERCC1, a subunit of the DNA structure-specific endonuclease XPF-ERCC1.

Authors:  Oleg V Tsodikov; Jacquelin H Enzlin; Orlando D Schärer; Tom Ellenberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  DNA repair gets physical: mapping an XPA-binding site on ERCC1.

Authors:  Deborah L Croteau; Ye Peng; Bennett Van Houten
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-03-14

4.  First reported patient with human ERCC1 deficiency has cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome with a mild defect in nucleotide excision repair and severe developmental failure.

Authors:  Nicolaas G J Jaspers; Anja Raams; Margherita Cirillo Silengo; Nils Wijgers; Laura J Niedernhofer; Andria Rasile Robinson; Giuseppina Giglia-Mari; Deborah Hoogstraten; Wim J Kleijer; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Wim Vermeulen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Physiological consequences of defects in ERCC1-XPF DNA repair endonuclease.

Authors:  Siobhán Q Gregg; Andria Rasile Robinson; Laura J Niedernhofer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-05-25

Review 6.  Initiation of DNA interstrand cross-link repair in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Erica M Hlavin; Michael B Smeaton; Paul S Miller
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 7.  Targeting and processing of site-specific DNA interstrand crosslinks.

Authors:  Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  The structure-specific endonuclease Ercc1-Xpf is required to resolve DNA interstrand cross-link-induced double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Laura J Niedernhofer; Hanny Odijk; Magda Budzowska; Ellen van Drunen; Alex Maas; Arjan F Theil; Jan de Wit; N G J Jaspers; H Berna Beverloo; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Double-strand breaks induce homologous recombinational repair of interstrand cross-links via cooperation of MSH2, ERCC1-XPF, REV3, and the Fanconi anemia pathway.

Authors:  Nianxiang Zhang; Xiuping Liu; Lei Li; Randy Legerski
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-07-31

10.  Characterization of CHO XPF mutant UV41: influence of XPF heterozygosity on double-strand break-induced intrachromosomal recombination.

Authors:  Leisa L Talbert; Luis Della Coletta; Megan G Lowery; Angela Bolt; David Trono; Gerald M Adair; Rodney S Nairn
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.