Literature DB >> 9087568

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of chromosomal changes occurring during development of acquired resistance to cisplatin in human ovarian carcinoma cells.

V M Wasenius1, A Jekunen, O Monni, H Joensuu, S Aebi, S B Howell, S Knuutila.   

Abstract

The genetic changes underlying the development of resistance to the platinum-containing drugs are poorly defined. We analyzed six resistant cell lines using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in order to screen and identify possible genetic changes in common. We compared parental 2008 and A2780 human ovarian cancer cells to sublines selected for resistance to cisplatin (DDP) (2008/C8, 2008/C13*5.25, 2008/A, A2780/CP); we also compared 2008 cells to sublines selected for resistance to antimonite (2008/H) and arsenite (2008/I) which demonstrated cross-resistance to DDP. DNA samples from the resistant cell lines were hybridized against DNA from the parental cells rather than from normal human cells to permit detection of only those changes associated with the development of resistance. The DNA sequence copy number changes were surprisingly numerous in the DDP, antimony, and arsenite-resistant variants of the 2008 cell line and most of the chromosomes were affected. On the other hand, in the A2780/CP subline only a few changes were found and these were limited to just four chromosomes. The most common findings among the DDP-resistant cell lines were gains of material from chromosomes or chromosome arms 2q (5 out of 6 lines), 4 (4/6), 6q (5/6), and 8q (4/6). Deletions were observed on chromosomes or chromosome arms 2p (4/6), X (4/6), 7p (5/6), 11p (4/6), and 13 (4/6). The most frequently involved chromosomal regions, affected in the majority of cell lines, were: gain of 2q14.1-q33, 4p15.2-p13, 4q22-q25, 4q31.1-q34, 6q13-q16, 8q12-q21.2, and loss of Xp22.2-q21, 7p21-p14, 11cen-p14 in sublines of 2008, and loss of 2pter-p22 and 13q21 in sublines of 2008 and A2780. The results suggest that the acquired resistance and cross-resistance to DDP in these cell lines was associated with substantial genomic instability, quite unlike the changes observed in association with the development of resistance to drugs participating in the multidrug resistance phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9087568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  12 in total

1.  Genomic imbalances associated with acquired resistance to platinum analogues.

Authors:  B Leyland-Jones; L R Kelland; K R Harrap; L R Hiorns
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Molecular genetics of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A N Shelling; W Foulkes
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  A comprehensive continuous-time model for the appearance of CGH signal due to chromosomal missegregations during mitosis.

Authors:  Richard Desper; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 4.  Exploiting nanotechnology to overcome tumor drug resistance: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Ameya R Kirtane; Stephen M Kalscheuer; Jayanth Panyam
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  EDD enhances cell survival and cisplatin resistance and is a therapeutic target for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Amber Bradley; Hui Zheng; Angela Ziebarth; Wayne Sakati; Melissa Branham-O'Connor; Joe B Blumer; Yuying Liu; Emily Kistner-Griffin; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Anil K Sood; Charles N Landen; Scott T Eblen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  The E3 ubiquitin ligase EDD is an adverse prognostic factor for serous epithelial ovarian cancer and modulates cisplatin resistance in vitro.

Authors:  P M O'Brien; M J Davies; J P Scurry; A N Smith; C A Barton; M J Henderson; D N Saunders; B S Gloss; K I Patterson; J L Clancy; V A Heinzelmann-Schwarz; Rajmohan Murali; R A Scolyer; Y Zeng; E D Williams; L Scurr; A Defazio; D I Quinn; C K W Watts; N F Hacker; S M Henshall; R L Sutherland
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Comparative genomic hybridization reveals population-based genetic alterations in hepatoblastomas.

Authors:  S G Gray; S Kytölä; T Matsunaga; C Larsson; T J Ekström
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Potential predictive markers of chemotherapy resistance in stage III ovarian serous carcinomas.

Authors:  Lovisa Osterberg; Kristina Levan; Karolina Partheen; Ulla Delle; Björn Olsson; Karin Sundfeldt; György Horvath
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression reveals specific signaling pathways associated with platinum resistance in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Meng Li; Curt Balch; John S Montgomery; Mikyoung Jeong; Jae Hoon Chung; Pearlly Yan; Tim H M Huang; Sun Kim; Kenneth P Nephew
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Role of cystine transport in intracellular glutathione level and cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer cell lines.

Authors:  S Okuno; H Sato; K Kuriyama-Matsumura; M Tamba; H Wang; S Sohda; H Hamada; H Yoshikawa; T Kondo; S Bannai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.