Literature DB >> 9084589

Neural correlates of a spatial sensory-to-motor transformation in primary motor cortex.

L Shen1, G E Alexander.   

Abstract

Primary motor cortex (MC) has been strongly implicated in motor processing, but there have been relatively few attempts to determine whether MC may also play a role in either sensory or context-dependent processing. In the present study, neuronal activity in MC was characterized in relation to the planning and execution of visually instructed limb movements whose trajectories were dissociated from their spatial targets. This design permitted the dissociation of neuronal activity related to motor processing from activity related to sensory or context-dependent processing. Two macaque monkeys were trained to perform a visually instructed, delayed reaching paradigm with indirect visual feedback. Subjects used the right forelimb to capture targets presented on a video display by moving a two-dimensional joystick whose position was reflected by a cursor. The target to be capture on each trial was indicated by a visual instruction stimulus (IS), which was separated from a movement-triggering stimulus (TS) by a variable delay. The direction of forelimb movement was dissociated from the location of the target by varying the spatial mappings between joystick and cursor across two conditions, unrotated (0 degrees offset between cursor and limb direction) and rotated (90 degrees offset). Task-related activity was recorded from a total of 180 MC neurons. The focus of this study was on directionally tuned neuronal activity that included phasic, stimulus-related activity following the IS; tonic, set-related activity between IS and TS; and phasic, movement-related activity following the TS. Of the entire sample of MC neurons with directionally tuned activity, 119 cells were tested both under rotation conditions, permitting dissociation of directional responses that depended on target locations from those that depended on limb trajectory. Task-related neuronal activity was classified as target dependent if it covaried exclusively with target location across both conditions, and as limb dependent if it covaried exclusively with limb trajectory. Directional activity that did not fulfill criteria for either target or limb dependence, because of changes across rotation conditions, was classified as complex. Approximately one quarter of MC neurons showed weak, but consistent, stimulus-related activity that was directionally tuned (24%, 29 of 119). Nearly all of the directionally classifiable stimulus-related activity was target dependent (94%, 15 of 16 responses), with the exception of a single limb-dependent response (6%, 1 of 16). A majority of MC neurons showed set-related activity that was directionally tuned (61%, 72 of 119). Of the directionally classifiable set-related activity, there were comparable numbers of target-dependent (37%, 16 of 43) and limb-dependent responses (35%, 15 of 43), with the remainder being complex (27%, 12 of 43). Movement-related activity following the TS was considered to be early or late, depending on whether it preceded or followed the onset of movement. The large majority of MC neurons showed early movement-related activity that was directionally tuned (86%, 102 of 119): among those whose neurons early activity was directionally classifiable, there were only one third as many target-dependent responses (14%, 11 of 79) as limb-dependent responses (43%, 34 of 79), with the remainder being complex (43%, 34 of 79). There was also a large majority of MC neurons that showed late movement-related activity that was directionally tuned (84%, 100 of 119): among those whose late activity was directionally classifiable, there were only one ninth as many target-dependent responses (5%, 4 of 88) as there were limb-dependent responses (41%, 36 of 88), with the remainder being complex (55%, 48 of 88). The instructed delay task employed in this study required a sensory-to-motor transformation through which the instructed target location was associated with a limb movement of the appropriate direction. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9084589     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  M Desmurget; H Gréa; J S Grethe; C Prablanc; G E Alexander; S T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  A theory of geometric constraints on neural activity for natural three-dimensional movement.

Authors:  K Zhang; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Prediction of muscle activity by populations of sequentially recorded primary motor cortex neurons.

Authors:  M M Morrow; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural responses in motor cortex and area 7a to real and apparent motion.

Authors:  Hugo Merchant; Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of behavioral context on the representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Participation of primary motor cortical neurons in a distributed network during maze solution: representation of spatial parameters and time-course comparison with parietal area 7a.

Authors:  David A Crowe; Matthew V Chafee; Bruno B Averbeck; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neuronal correlates of movement dynamics in the dorsal and ventral premotor area in the monkey.

Authors:  Jun Xiao; Camillo Padoa-Schioppa; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neuronal activity in primary motor cortex differs when monkeys perform somatosensory and visually guided wrist movements.

Authors:  Yu Liu; John M Denton; Randall J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The importance of being agranular: a comparative account of visual and motor cortex.

Authors:  Stewart Shipp
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Neural dynamics of reaching following incorrect or absent motor preparation.

Authors:  K Cora Ames; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.