Literature DB >> 9084384

Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women.

M Labrecque1, L Baillargeon, M Dallaire, A Tremblay, J J Pinault, S Gingras.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between median episiotomy and severe (third- and fourth-degree) perineal lacerations in primiparous women.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: University-affiliated hospital providing secondary obstetric care in Quebec City. PATIENTS: A total of 6522 primiparous women who gave birth vaginally to a single live baby in cephalic position between 1985 and 1993. OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations.
RESULTS: Median episiotomy was performed in 4390 women (67.3%). A total of 1002 women (15.4%) had a third- or fourth-degree laceration. The frequency of severe perineal lacerations was 20.6% with episiotomy and 4.5% without episiotomy (relative risk [RR] 4.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.74-5.62). This association persisted after adjustment by stratified analysis for type of delivery and birth weight (RR 3.03, 95% CI 2.52-3.63) and by logistic regression for type of delivery, birth weight, epidural analgesia, shoulder dystocia, baby's head circumference, experience of the physician and year of delivery (odds ratio 3.58, 95% CI 2.84-4.50).
CONCLUSION: Median episiotomy is strongly associated with third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in primiparous women. Reducing the use of this procedure could decrease the occurrence of severe perineal tears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9084384      PMCID: PMC1227042     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  9 in total

1.  Demographic variations and clinical associations of episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Dotun Ogunyemi; Brandy Manigat; Jesse Marquis; Mohsen Bazargan
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  A practical foundation.

Authors:  M S Godwin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Structured hands-on workshop decreases the over-detection rate of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Haim Krissi; Amir Aviram; Liran Hiersch; Eran Ashwal; Ram Eitan; Yoav Peled
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Anal incontinence after childbirth.

Authors:  Erica Eason; Michel Labrecque; Sylvie Marcoux; Myrto Mondor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Family physicians in maternity care. Still in the game? Report from the CFPC's Janus Project.

Authors:  A J Reid; I Grava-Gubins; J C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal delivery of twins: associated risk factors and comparison with singletons.

Authors:  Shay Porat; David Baud; Dan Farine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Long- and short-term complications of episiotomy.

Authors:  İsmet Gün; Bülent Doğan; Özkan Özdamar
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-15

8.  Once episiotomy, always episiotomy?

Authors:  Ayala Zilberman; Eyal Sheiner; Orit Barrett; Batel Hamou; Tali Silberstein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Risk and protective factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: A retrospective nationwide study.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Marschalek; Christof Worda; Lorenz Kuessel; Heinz Koelbl; Willi Oberaigner; Hermann Leitner; Julian Marschalek; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.689

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.