Literature DB >> 9084104

A useful method for measuring daily physical activity by a three-direction monitor.

A Sugimoto1, Y Hara, T W Findley, K Yoncmoto.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a three-direction accelerometer is useful for measuring daily physical activity. Physical activity, being an important part of human behavior, may be related to various aspects of health and disease. In this study, the relationship between the intensity of each action and the three-direction accelerometer (Actigraph) output was compared in 10 healthy subjects under free-living conditions. Subjects wore the Actigraph on their non-dominant wrist and filled out a physical activity check list (self-report) throughout the daytime. Daily physical activities were classified into six categories according to different intensities. The differences of the Actigraph output among each of the six categories were significant by the Kruskal-Wallis analysis (p = 0.001). The Actigraph output appeared to correlate highly with the intensity of actions by the Spearman Rank test (r = 0.95, p < 0.05). The Actigraph output was over-estimated while the subjects were typing, driving and being a passenger in a motor vehicle. The Actigraph was shown to be a useful and convenient device for measuring daily physical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9084104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 0036-5505


  6 in total

1.  Measurement and description of physical activity in adult manual wheelchair users.

Authors:  Catherine A Warms; Joanne D Whitney; Basia Belza
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.554

2.  Fatigue, depression, sleep, and activity during chemotherapy: daily and intraday variation and relationships among symptom changes.

Authors:  Heather S L Jim; Brent Small; Leigh Anne Faul; Jamie Franzen; Sachin Apte; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 3.  A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.

Authors:  Kieran P Dowd; Robert Szeklicki; Marco Alessandro Minetto; Marie H Murphy; Angela Polito; Ezio Ghigo; Hidde van der Ploeg; Ulf Ekelund; Janusz Maciaszek; Rafal Stemplewski; Maciej Tomczak; Alan E Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Decoding accelerometry for classification and prediction of critically ill patients with severe brain injury.

Authors:  Shubhayu Bhattacharyay; John Rattray; Matthew Wang; Peter H Dziedzic; Eusebia Calvillo; Han B Kim; Eshan Joshi; Pawel Kudela; Ralph Etienne-Cummings; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stéphanie A Prince; Kristi B Adamo; Meghan E Hamel; Jill Hardt; Sarah Connor Gorber; Mark Tremblay
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Optimal placement of accelerometers for the detection of everyday activities.

Authors:  Ian Cleland; Basel Kikhia; Chris Nugent; Andrey Boytsov; Josef Hallberg; Kåre Synnes; Sally McClean; Dewar Finlay
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.