Literature DB >> 9083342

Selection of monoclonal antibody E48 IgG or U36 IgG for adjuvant radioimmunotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.

R de Bree1, J C Roos, M A Plaizier, J J Quak, G J van Kamp, W den Hollander, G B Snow, G A van Dongen.   

Abstract

Preliminary data from recent clinical radioimmunoscintigraphy studies indicate that 99mTc-labelled murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) E48 and U36 have a similar ability to target squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) selectively. In the present study we describe additional aspects of murine and chimeric MAb (mMAb and cMAb) E48 and U36, which might influence the selection of one MAb for adjuvant radioimmunotherapy. To make direct comparison possible, ten patients received 11.2 +/- 0.3 and 11.1 +/- 0.2 mg (n = 5) or 51.1 +/- 0.1 and 51.0 +/- 0.4 mg (n = 5) of both mE48 IgG and mU36 IgG labelled with 131I and 125I simultaneously and underwent surgery 7-8 days after injection. The mean uptake of iodine-labelled mE48 IgG and mU36 was highest in tumour tissue, 8.9 +/- 8.9 and 8.2 +/- 4.4 %ID kg(-1) respectively. Tumour to non-tumour ratios for oral mucosa, skin, muscle, blood and bone marrow aspirate were 2.5, 5.5, 25.2, 4.7 and 4.0 respectively in the case of mE48 IgG and 2.3, 4.1, 21.0, 5.8 and 5.8 respectively in the case of mU36 IgG. The distribution of mMAbs E48 and U36 throughout tumours that had been collected in previous studies was heterogeneous when administered at a dose of 1 or 12 mg, and homogeneous when administered at a dose of 52 mg. Administration of mE48 IgG (1-52 mg) resulted in a human anti-mouse antibody response in 12 out of 28 patients, while for mU36 IgG (1-52 mg), this figure was three out of 18 patients. cMAb E48 was shown to be highly effective in mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro, while cMAb U36 and mMAbs E48 and U36 were not effective at all. Rationales are provided that give priority to the start of adjuvant radioimmunotherapy trials with 186Re-labelled cMAb U36 IgG in head and neck cancer patients who are at high risk for the development of locoregional recurrences and distant metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9083342      PMCID: PMC2222739          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  26 in total

1.  Clinical experience with rhenium-186-labeled monoclonal antibodies for radioimmunotherapy: results of phase I trials.

Authors:  H B Breitz; P L Weiden; J L Vanderheyden; J W Appelbaum; M J Bjorn; M F Fer; S B Wolf; B A Ratliff; C A Seiler; D C Foisie
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Future role of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies in oncological diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  D M Goldenberg
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  A 22-kd surface antigen detected by monoclonal antibody E 48 is exclusively expressed in stratified squamous and transitional epithelia.

Authors:  J J Quak; A J Balm; G A van Dongen; J G Brakkee; R J Scheper; G B Snow; C J Meijer
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  MAb U36, a novel monoclonal antibody successful in immunotargeting of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  A H Schrijvers; J J Quak; A M Uyterlinde; M van Walsum; C J Meijer; G B Snow; G A van Dongen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  186Re-labeled monoclonal antibody E48 immunoglobulin G-mediated therapy of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts.

Authors:  M Gerretsen; G W Visser; M van Walsum; C J Meijer; G B Snow; G A van Dongen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  The effect of antibody protein dose on the uniformity of tumor distribution of radioantibodies: an autoradiographic study.

Authors:  R D Blumenthal; I Fand; R M Sharkey; O C Boerman; R Kashi; D M Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.968

7.  Antibody localization in human renal cell carcinoma: a phase I study of monoclonal antibody G250.

Authors:  E Oosterwijk; N H Bander; C R Divgi; S Welt; J C Wakka; R D Finn; E A Carswell; S M Larson; S O Warnaar; G J Fleuren
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Radioimmunoscintigraphy and biodistribution of technetium-99m-labeled monoclonal antibody U36 in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  R de Bree; J C Roos; J J Quak; W den Hollander; G B Snow; G A van Dongen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Biological activity of human-mouse IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 chimeric monoclonal antibodies with antitumor specificity.

Authors:  Z Steplewski; L K Sun; C W Shearman; J Ghrayeb; P Daddona; H Koprowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Adjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  P M Stell; N S Rawson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  PET tracers based on Zirconium-89.

Authors:  Yin Zhang; Hao Hong; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Curr Radiopharm       Date:  2011-04

2.  Production and characterization of a peptide-based monoclonal antibody against CD44 variant 6.

Authors:  Saeed Zarei; Ali Ahmad Bayat; Reza Hadavi; Ahmad R Mahmoudi; Banafsheh Tavangar; Yasaman Vojgani; Mahmood Jeddi-Tehrani; Zahra Amirghofran
Journal:  Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother       Date:  2015-02

3.  In vitro evaluation of the astatinated chimeric monoclonal antibody U36, a potential candidate for treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Nestor; M Persson; G A M S van Dongen; H J Jensen; H Lundqvist; M Anniko; V Tolmachev
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Lymphocyte antigen 6 superfamily member D is a marker of urothelial and squamous differentiation: implications for risk stratification of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Nina Andersson; Johan Ohlsson; Sara Wahlin; Björn Nodin; Karolina Boman; Sebastian Lundgren; Karin Jirström
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2020-10-07

5.  Suppression of annexin A11 in ovarian cancer: implications in chemoresistance.

Authors:  Jin Song; Ie-ming Shih; Daniel W Chan; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.715

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.