Literature DB >> 9083233

How reliable is the predictive value of SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in severe brain damage with special regard to the bilateral loss of cortical responses?

B Pohlmann-Eden1, K Dingethal, H J Bender, W Koelfen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients sustaining severe brain damage (SBD), prediction of later outcome is often very difficult, in particular under conditions of therapeutic management like relaxation and intravenous phenobarbital. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) correlated best with later prognosis and expected neurological deficit. In detail, the primary bilateral loss of cortical responses (BLCR) is regarded to be a reliable marker for poor prognosis. The goal of the following prospective study was to reassess the prognostic value of early serial median nerve SEP recording in severe brain damage in comparison to other neurophysiological, clinical, and neuroradiological parameters and, additionally, to test the hypothesis, that the BLCR-pattern is always associated with a poor prognosis and is never reversible.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Anaesthesiological hospital intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 42 comatose patients with severe brain damage (29 males/13 females), mean age 39.6 +/- 19.3 years, mean initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 6.6 +/- 3.1, investigated by means of median somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) with serial recordings on day 1, 3 to 4, and 8 to 1, and repeated cranial computerized tomography. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: We classified the outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Our data showed a high correlation of initial SEP scores (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.70) with outcome for both a favorable and an unfavorable prognosis (p = 0.0001). The reliability increased with serial recordings. The SEPs showed superiority to parallel brainstem auditory evoked potentials (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.50, p = 0.0007), GCS, and standardized neuroradiological criteria. Primary (BLCR) occurred in 16 patients (38%) and implied a fatal prognosis in all adult patients (n = 15, specificity = 93.3%, sensitivity = 59.3%). In contrast, a young child with predominant brainstem hemorrhagic contusions regained consciousness and developed mild to moderate neurological deficit (GOS 3-4) during long-term follow-up of 4 years. This clinical improvement paralleled bilateral asymmetric recovery of cortical SEP responses.
CONCLUSIONS: SEP allow an early reliable assessment of both poor and good prognosis in SBD, in particular when applied serially. BLCR does not always imply a fatal diagnosis, as a circumscribed contusional lesion rarely may lead to selective reversible blockage of ascending somatosensory pathways in the brainstem. In contradiction to this lesional etiology, a hypoxia-induced BLCR pattern seems to correlate strictly with a poor prognosis, reflecting a different pathogenesis with diffuse destruction of cortex and thalamocortical pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9083233     DOI: 10.1007/s001340050332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  7 in total

1.  Anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: clinical and electrophysiological associations with outcome.

Authors:  G Bryan Young; Gordon Doig; Aldo Ragazzoni
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  [Value of early somatosensory evoked potentials in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with craniocerebral trauma].

Authors:  E Maurer; P Milewski; C Ulrich
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose children: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Riccardo Carrai; Antonello Grippo; Silvia Lori; Francesco Pinto; Aldo Amantini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  [Coma. The prognostic value of evoked potentials in patients after traumatic brain injury].

Authors:  M H Morgalla; J Bauer; R Ritz; M Tatagiba
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Prognosis in prolonged coma patients with diffuse axonal injury assessed by somatosensory evoked potentia.

Authors:  Xiujue Zheng; Mantao Chen; Jingqi Li; Fei Cao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  Somatosensory and Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials Assessed between 4 and 7 Days after Severe Stroke Onset Predict Unfavorable Outcome.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Ying Ying Su; Shu Ying Xiao; Yi Fei Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.