Literature DB >> 9083160

Prognostic factors for clinically localized prostate carcinoma: analysis of 938 patients irradiated in the prostate specific antigen era.

G K Zagars1, A Pollack, A C von Eschenbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level is a powerful prognostic factor for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. The traditional prognostic factors, T classification and Gleason score, appear to have been relegated to a minor position. This study was conducted to evaluate the relative prognostic roles of PSA, T classification, and Gleason score in a large cohort of men irradiated in the PSA era.
METHODS: The authors analyzed the outcome for a group of 938 men with T1-T4, N0 or NX, M0 prostate carcinoma who received definitive external beam radiation therapy as their only initial treatment during the period 1987-1995. The T classifications were as follows: T1, 283 (30%); T2, 360 (38%); T3/T4, 295 (31%). Gleason scores were as follows: Gleason 2-6, 580 (62%); Gleason 7, 224 (24%); Gleason 8-10, 122 (13%). Pretreatment PSA levels (ng/mL) were as follows: PSA < or = 4, 167 (18%); PSA 4 to < or = 10, 363 (39%); PSA 10 to < or = 20, 259 (28%); PSA > 20, 149 (16%). At a mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 6-106 months), disease outcome specified as relapse/rising PSA, local recurrence, or metastasis was analyzed using univariate and multivariate techniques.
RESULTS: The 6-year actuarial incidences of relapse/rising PSA, local recurrence, and metastases were 48%, 27%, and, 6%, respectively. In multivariate regression, pretreatment PSA level, T classification, and Gleason score were each independently highly significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with every endpoint. Pretreatment PSA level was the most significant variable for rising PSA and local recurrence, and T classification was the most significant variable for metastatic relapse. Using relapse/rising PSA as the endpoint, the authors formulated a highly significant 6-tier prognostic grouping based on PSA, T classification, and Gleason score, as follows: Category I: T1/T2, PSA < or = 4, and Gleason 2-6 (relapse rate, 6%); Category II: T1/T2, PSA < or = 4 and Gleason 7-10, or PSA 4 to < or = 10 and Gleason 2-7 (relapse rate, 30%); Category III: T1/T2, PSA 4 to < or = 10 and Gleason 8-10, or PSA 10 to < or = 20 and Gleason < 8 (relapse rate, 40%); Category IV: T3/T4, PSA < 10 (relapse rate, 46%); Category V: T3/T4, PSA 10 to < or = 20, and Gleason < 8 (relapse rate, 57%); Category unfavorable: any T, PSA > 20 and any Gleason, or PSA 10 to < or = 20 and Gleason 8-10 (relapse rate, 88%).
CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of T classification and Gleason score as independent prognostic factors bridges an apparent gap between an older era and the current PSA era. PSA has supplemented, rather than supplanted, the utility of the traditionally established prognostic factors for clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9083160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Combining radiation therapy and androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer-a critical review.

Authors:  A Dal Pra; F L Cury; L Souhami
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Prostate cancer: 4. Screening.

Authors:  F Meyer; Y Fradet
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  The current and potential role of cryoablation as a primary therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aaron E Katz; John C Rewcastle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (sixth and seventh editions) for clinically localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk-stratification method.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Tianyu Li; Karthik Devarajan; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicole M Golbari; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Global methylation pattern of genes in androgen-sensitive and androgen-independent prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Dhruva Kumar Mishra; Zujian Chen; Yanyuan Wu; Marianna Sarkissyan; H Phillip Koeffler; Jaydutt V Vadgama
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 8.  Treatment strategies for high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Seth A Rosenthal; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  The association of retinoic acid receptor beta2(RARβ2) methylation status and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tianyi Gao; Bangshun He; Yuqin Pan; Rui Li; Yeqiong Xu; Liping Chen; Zhenling Nie; Ling Gu; Shukui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.