Literature DB >> 9081358

A double-blind, randomised comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of two intravenous doses of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron in patients receiving high dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

B Audhuy1, P Cappelaere, M Martin, A Cervantes, M Fabbro, A Rivière, D Khayat, H Bleiberg, M Faraldi, N Claverie, E Aranda, G Auclerc, B Audhuy1, A Benhammouda, H Bleiberg, L Cals, P Cappelaere, A Cattan, A Cervantes, B Chevallier, T Conroy, D Cupissol, J De Grève, E Diaz-Rubio, J F Seitz.   

Abstract

This multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of single intravenous doses of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron in the prevention of acute emesis and nausea due to high-dose (> or = 80 mg/m2) cisplatin. Single intravenous doses of 1.8 or 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate or 3 mg of granisetron hydrochloride were administered in a volume of 50 ml over a 5-min period, beginning 30 min prior to cisplatin (> or = 80 mg/m2) administration. The number and timing of emetic episodes, time to administration of escape anti-emetic medication, severity of nausea by visual analogue scale (VAS), and safety were monitored for 24 h after the start of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Investigators' evaluations of overall efficacy and patients' satisfaction with therapy were recorded at the end of the 24-h study period. Of the 474 patients evaluable for efficacy, complete responses were achieved by 54, 47 and 48% of patients given dolasetron mesilate 1.8 mg/kg, dolasetron mesilate 2.4 mg/kg and granisetron, respectively. Statistically, treatment groups had comparable complete and complete plus major responses, times to first emesis, and use of escape medication; patient maximum nausea severity and treatment satisfaction ratings; and physician nausea severity and overall efficacy assessments. For the majority of efficacy endpoints, 1.8 mg/kg dolasetron mesilate produced numerically superior responses compared with the 2.4 mg/kg dose. Gender and prior chemotherapy were significant predictors of complete response; males and chemotherapy-naive patients had higher responses. The overall incidences of adverse events were comparable among the treatment groups; headache and diarrhoea were most common. In conclusion, 1.8 and 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron (3 mg) were equally effective in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. In addition, because no additional benefit was observed with 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate and numerically greater responses were observed with the 1.8 mg/kg dose, the lower dose of 1.8 mg/kg is optimal for further clinical development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9081358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  18 in total

Review 1.  Stratified administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons) for chemotherapy-induced emesis. Economic implications.

Authors:  L A Sanchez; M Holdsworth; S B Bartel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  A risk-benefit assessment of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in antineoplastic therapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  E A Perez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Involvement of the dorsomedial hypothalamus and the nucleus tractus solitarii in chronic cardiovascular changes associated with anxiety in rats.

Authors:  Caroline Sévoz-Couche; Charly Brouillard; Françoise Camus; Dominique Laude; Sietse F De Boer; Chrystel Becker; Jean-Jacques Benoliel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  An evaluation of potential signals for ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest with dolasetron, ondansetron, and granisetron in the fda combined spontaneous reporting system/adverse event reporting system.

Authors:  Frederick M Schnell; Andrew J Coop
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-09

Review 5.  Same old story? Do we need to modify our supportive care treatment of elderly cancer patients? Focus on antiemetics.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. A comparison of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  R E Gregory; D S Ettinger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Electrocardiographic findings of palonosetron in cancer patients.

Authors:  Guzin Gonullu; Sabri Demircan; Mustafa Kemal Demirag; Dilek Erdem; Idris Yucel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting: are they all the same?

Authors:  Tong J Gan
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  The acute effect of tropisetron on ECG parameters in cancer patients.

Authors:  Ozlem Yavas; Mehmet Yazici; Onder Eren; Cem Boruban; Mehmet Artac; Mine Genc
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Factors influencing the choice of 5-HT3-receptor antagonist antiemetics: focus on elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli; Matti Aapro
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.