Literature DB >> 9080188

An analysis of large rRNA sequences folded by a thermodynamic method.

D S Fields1, R R Gutell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The secondary structure of RNA can be predicted by the thermodynamics-based method of Zuker and Turner. The accuracy of the method's secondary structure predictions for rRNA can be assessed by using as reference the currently available rRNA secondary structure models that have been derived from comparative analysis of rRNA sequence alignments.
RESULTS: We folded 72 23S rRNA sequences with the Zuker-Turner method and scored the resulting secondary structure predictions against the comparative model. Empirically, trends in the score were observed as a function of the phylogenetic memberships of the sequences and as a function of the base pairs secondary structural contexts. Further, three parameters were found that (anti-)correlate with the score.
CONCLUSIONS: Three semiquantitative predictors of score were found: % of noncanonical base pairs, % of hairpin loops that were stable tetraloops, and sequence %G + C. The folding of rRNA is a tractable problem and thermodynamics-based folding algorithms, in particular, are useful in the study of this folding problem even for large RNA molecules (e.g. 16S and 23S rRNA).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9080188     DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00058-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fold Des        ISSN: 1359-0278


  15 in total

1.  Improved statistical methods reveal direct interactions between 16S and 23S rRNA.

Authors:  S T Kelley; V R Akmaev; G D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Predicted secondary structure for 28S and 18S rRNA from Ichneumonoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apocrita): impact on sequence alignment and phylogeny estimation.

Authors:  Joseph J Gillespie; Matthew J Yoder; Robert A Wharton
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Large deviations for random trees and the branching of RNA secondary structures.

Authors:  Yuri Bakhtin; Christine E Heitsch
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Watson-Crick pairing, the Heisenberg group and Milnor invariants.

Authors:  Siddhartha Gadgil
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  A benchmark of multiple sequence alignment programs upon structural RNAs.

Authors:  Paul P Gardner; Andreas Wilm; Stefan Washietl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Structures of the human and Drosophila 80S ribosome.

Authors:  Andreas M Anger; Jean-Paul Armache; Otto Berninghausen; Michael Habeck; Marion Subklewe; Daniel N Wilson; Roland Beckmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Global or local? Predicting secondary structure and accessibility in mRNAs.

Authors:  Sita J Lange; Daniel Maticzka; Mathias Möhl; Joshua N Gagnon; Chris M Brown; Rolf Backofen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Efficient pairwise RNA structure prediction and alignment using sequence alignment constraints.

Authors:  Robin D Dowell; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Evaluating the accuracy of SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure predictions.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Sükösd; M Shel Swenson; Jørgen Kjems; Christine E Heitsch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A comprehensive comparison of comparative RNA structure prediction approaches.

Authors:  Paul P Gardner; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.