Literature DB >> 9078507

The effect of grain source and grain processing on performance of feedlot cattle: a review.

F N Owens1, D S Secrist, W J Hill, D R Gill.   

Abstract

Effects of grain species and grain processing method on DMI, rate and efficiency of gain, and feeding value for cattle fed high concentrate diets were appraised by statistically compiling results from 605 comparisons from feeding trials published in North American journals and experiment station bulletins since 1974. Metabolizable energy (ME) values for each grain and processing method were calculated by quadratic procedures from DMI and animal performance. Averaged across processing methods, ME values for corn, milo, and wheat grain (3.40, 3.22, and 3.46 Mcal/kg DM) fell within 9% of ME estimates from NRC (1996) for beef cattle. In contrast, ME values for barley and oats grain (3.55 and 3.46 Mcal/kg DM) were 24% and 17% greater than NRC (1996) estimates. Compared with the dry rolled forms, high moisture corn and milo resulted in lower ADG and DMI. Compared with dry rolling, either steam rolling or flaking of corn, milo, and wheat decreased DMI without decreasing ADG and improved feed efficiency by 10, 15, and 10%, respectively. Compared with dry rolled grain, steam flaking increased (P < .05) body weight-adjusted ME of corn and milo grain by 15 and 21%, respectively; body weight-adjusted ME for whole corn was 9% greater (P < .05) than for rolled corn grain. Steam flaking was surprisingly effective (13%) at increasing (P < .05) the body weight-adjusted ME of wheat, but steam flaking failed to increase the ME of barley and oats. Higher moisture content of high-moisture corn decreased dry matter intake without depressing ADG and improved efficiency and increased ME of the grain. Compared with steam flakes of moderate thinness, processing milo or barley to a very thin flake tended to reduce ADG and failed to improve feed efficiency. The ideal roughage source and roughage moisture content for maximum ME and ADG varied with grain processing method. Feeding corn silage rather than alfalfa and wet rather than dry roughage depressed (P < .01) ADG of cattle and reduced (P < .01) body weight-adjusted ME of cattle fed high-moisture corn grain but tended to increase both with steam-flaked corn or wheat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9078507     DOI: 10.2527/1997.753868x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  32 in total

1.  Influence of grain processing on acid-base balance in feedlot steers.

Authors:  C Castillo; J Hernández; J Méndez; J Llena; V Pereira; M López-Alonso; J L Benedito
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 2.  Enzymatic polishing of cereal grains for improved nutrient retainment.

Authors:  Anshu Singh; Sandipan Karmakar; B Samuel Jacob; Patrali Bhattacharya; S P Jeevan Kumar; Rintu Banerjee
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Nisin resistance of Streptococcus bovis.

Authors:  H C Mantovani; J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Fibrolytic enzymes improve the nutritive value of high-moisture corn for finishing bulls.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Ribeiro Salvo; Viviane C Gritti; João Luiz Pratti Daniel; Leandro S Martins; Fernanda Lopes; Flavio Augusto Portela Santos; Luiz Gustavo Nussio
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effects of dietary roughage neutral detergent fiber levels and flint corn processing method on growth performance, carcass characteristics, feeding behavior, and rumen morphometrics of Bos indicus cattle1.

Authors:  Antonio Humberto F de Melo; Rodrigo S Marques; Vinícius N Gouvêa; Jonas de Souza; Camila D A Batalha; Débora C Basto; Danilo D Millen; James S Drouillard; Flávio A P Santos
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Roughage levels impact on performance and carcass traits of finishing Nellore cattle fed whole corn grain diets.

Authors:  Marcela de Almeida Contadini; Fernanda Altieri Ferreira; Rosana Ruegger Silva Corte; Daniel Silva Antonelo; Juan Fernando Morales Gómez; Saulo da Luz E Silva
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Effects of source and concentration of neutral detergent fiber from roughage in beef cattle diets on feed intake, ingestive behavior, and ruminal kinetics.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Goulart; Ricardo A M Vieira; Joao L P Daniel; Rafael C Amaral; Vanessa P Santos; Sergio G Toledo Filho; Edward H Cabezas-Garcia; Luis O Tedeschi; Luiz G Nussio
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of feeding barley or corn silage with dry-rolled barley, corn, or a blend of barley and corn grain on rumen fermentation, total tract digestibility, and nitrogen balance for finishing beef heifers.

Authors:  Jordan A Johnson; Brittney D Sutherland; John J McKinnon; Tim A McAllister; Gregory B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Comparison of the fermentation and bacterial community in the colon of Hu sheep fed a low-grain, non-pelleted, or pelleted high-grain diet.

Authors:  Limei Lin; Ehab Bo Trabi; Fei Xie; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Effects of high-amylase corn on performance and carcass quality of finishing beef heifers.

Authors:  Lucas M Horton; Cadra L Van Bibber-Krueger; Hans C Müller; James S Drouillard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.