Literature DB >> 9076613

Effects of commonly used cooking practices on total mercury concentration in fish and their impact on exposure assessments.

J N Morgan1, M R Berry, R L Graves.   

Abstract

The effects of cooking practices commonly used by Native Americans on total mercury concentrations in fish were investigated. A preparation factor relating mercury concentrations in fish as prepared for consumption to mercury concentration data as measured in typical environmental monitoring programs was calculated. Preparation factors are needed to provide risk assessors with a more accurate estimate of the actual amount of mercury ingested through consumption of contaminated fish. Data on fish preparation and consumption practices of two communities of Chippewa residing on the shores of Lake Superior in northern Wisconsin were used to select practices for study. The most commonly consumed species, walleye and lake trout, were selected. Whitefish livers were also selected for study. Commonly used cooking techniques including panfrying, deep-frying, baking, boiling, and smoking were duplicated in the laboratory. Total mercury concentrations were determined in fish portions before and after cooking and in a portion representative of that analyzed in programs to assess water quality (skin-on fillets). Total mercury was determined by microwave digestion-cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy. Mercury concentrations (wet weight basis) in panfried, baked, and boiled walleye fillets and deep-fried and baked whitefish livers ranged from 1.1 to 1.5 times higher than in corresponding raw portions. In lake trout, mercury concentrations were 1.5 to 2.0 times higher in cooked portions than in the raw portion. However, total mercury levels were constant before and after cooking, indicating the concentration effect is caused by weight (moisture and fat) loss. The addition of lemon juice to potentially release mercury from its bound state and promote volatilization did not exert any measurable influence on mercury concentrations in cooked walleye. In some cases mercury concentrations were increased with increased cooking times due to further loss of moisture and fat. Preparation factors (defined as the ratio of mercury concentration in cooked fish to the mercury concentration in the environmental portion) ranged from 1.3 to 2.0. Results suggest that consideration be given to the use of preparation factors in risk assessments, exposure assessments, or issuance of fish advisories where mercury concentration in raw fish tissue are used in conjunction with cooked fish meal sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9076613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  9 in total

1.  Human exposure to methylmercury from crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in China.

Authors:  Qian Peng; Ben K Greenfield; Fei Dang; Huan Zhong
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Elevated mercury and PCB concentrations in Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) collected near a formerly used defense site on Sivuqaq, Alaska.

Authors:  Renee Jordan-Ward; Frank A von Hippel; Guomao Zheng; Amina Salamova; Danielle Dillon; Jesse Gologergen; Tiffany Immingan; Elliott Dominguez; Pamela Miller; David Carpenter; John H Postlethwait; Samuel Byrne; C Loren Buck
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 10.753

3.  Contamination of different portions of raw and boiled specimens of Norway lobster by mercury and selenium.

Authors:  Monia Perugini; Pierina Visciano; Maurizio Manera; Maria Cesarina Abete; Stefania Gavinelli; Michele Amorena
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Mercury exposure: medical and public health issues.

Authors:  Kathryn R Mahaffey
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2005

5.  Hair mercury and risk assessment for consumption of contaminated seafood in residents from the coast of the Persian Gulf, Iran.

Authors:  Narjes Okati; Abbas Esmaili-Sari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Sources of Mercury Exposure to Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Rita Ann Kampalath; Jennifer Ayla Jay
Journal:  J Health Pollut       Date:  2015-07-02

7.  Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plants.

Authors:  Rui Li; Han Wu; Jing Ding; Weimin Fu; Lijun Gan; Yi Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 and 2000.

Authors:  Kathryn R Mahaffey; Robert P Clickner; Catherine C Bodurow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Effects of Speciation, Cooking and Changes in Bioaccessibility on Methylmercury Exposure Assessment for Contrasting Diets of Fish and Marine Mammals.

Authors:  Tania Charette; Gregory Kaminski; Maikel Rosabal; Marc Amyot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.