Literature DB >> 9076380

Functional characteristics of myocardial bridging. A combined angiographic and intracoronary Doppler flow study.

E R Schwarz1, H G Klues, J vom Dahl, I Klein, W Krebs, P Hanrath.   

Abstract

AIMS: Combined quantitative coronary angiography and intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements were performed to study the underlying haemodynamic mechanisms leading to myocardial ischaemia in patients with myocardial bridging in the absence of coronary artery disease. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 42 symptomatic patients with myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery, quantitative coronary angiography was used to measure absolute and relative vessel diameters during systole and diastole. In 14 patients, serial frame-by-frame diameter quantification during a complete cardiac cycle was performed. Intracoronary blood flow velocities were determined using a 0.014 inch Doppler flow guide wire proximal, within, and distal to myocardial bridges, and coronary flow reserve was calculated. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed a maximal systolic lumen diameter reduction of 71 +/- 16% with a persistent diameter reduction of 35 +/- 13% during mid-diastole. Flow velocities revealed increased average diastolic peak flow velocities within myocardial bridges of 38.6 +/- 19 cm.s-1 vs 22.4 +/- 7.7 cm.s-1 proximal and 18.6 +/- 4.6 cm.s-1 distal (P < 0.001), which increased during rapid pacing (64.7 +/- 25 cm.s-1, P < 0.001 vs baseline). Coronary flow reserve distal to myocardial bridges was 2.3 +/- 0.9 (vs 2.9 +/- 0.9 proximal, P < 0.05). There was a characteristic Doppler flow profile within myocardial bridges with an early diastolic overshoot, which was further augmented during rapid pacing.
CONCLUSION: Myocardial bridging is characterized by a delay in diastolic lumen gain and a concomitant increase in diastolic intracoronary Doppler flow velocities, which are enhanced by rapid pacing. In combination with a reduced coronary flow reserve and anginal symptoms these findings support the concept of a haemodynamically significant obstruction to coronary flow due to myocardial bridging in a selected subset of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9076380     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  18 in total

1.  Invasive assessment of myocardial bridges.

Authors:  M J Lovell; C J Knight
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of the Physiological Significance of Myocardial Bridging.

Authors:  Valtteri Uusitalo; Antti Saraste; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Effect of treadmill exercise testing on P wave duration and dispersion in patients with isolated myocardial bridging.

Authors:  Irfan Barutcu; Ali Metin Esen; Ramazan Ozdemir; Nusret Acikgoz; Muhsin Turkmen; Cevat Kirma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Morphological aspects of myocardial bridges.

Authors:  Almira Lujinović; Amela Kulenović; Eldan Kapur; Refet Gojak
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  SPECT perfusion imaging and myocardial bridges: bridging the gap of diagnostic uncertainty.

Authors:  Erin M Galbraith; Parham Eshtehardi; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Myocardial bridging: what have we learned in the past and will new diagnostic modalities provide new insights?

Authors:  A V G Bruschke; C E Veltman; M A de Graaf; H W Vliegen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 7.  Myocardial Bridging: An Up-to-Date Review.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Cheng-Han Chen
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.022

8.  Alteration of left ventricular function with dobutamine challenge in patients with myocardial bridge.

Authors:  Joon-Hyung Jhi; Kyoung-Im Cho; Jong-Kun Ha; Chan-Woo Jung; Bong-Jae Kim; Seong-Oh Park; A-Ra Jo; Seong-Man Kim; Hyeon-Gook Lee; Tae-Ik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Myocardial perfusion GSPECT imaging in patients with myocardial bridging.

Authors:  Rafał Gawor; Jacek Kuśmierek; Anna Płachcińska; Małgorzata Bieńkiewicz; Jarosław Drożdż; Grzegorz Piotrowski; Krzysztof Chiżyński
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Mechanisms involved in symptomatic myocardial bridging: Value of sequential testing for endothelial function, flow reserve measurements and dobutamine stress angiography.

Authors:  A J C Hazenberg; G A J Jessurun; R A Tio
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.