Literature DB >> 9076214

International variation in ophthalmologic management of patients with cataracts. Results from the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study.

J C Norregaard1, O D Schein, G F Anderson, J Alonso, E Dunn, C Black, T F Andersen, P Bernth-Petersen, L Bellan, M Espallargues.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe international variation in the management of patients with cataacts in 4 health care systems and to discuss the potential implications for cost and utilization of services.
DESIGN: To characterize current clinical practice on patients with no coexisting medical or ocular conditions, a standardized questionnaire was sent to random samples of ophthalmologists in the United States (response rate, 82.5%), Canada (66.9%), and Barcelona, Spain (70.4%), and to all ophthalmologists in Denmark (80.1%). From the United States, 526 ophthalmologists who performed cataract surgery participated in the study; there were 276 from Canada, 89 from Barcelona, and 82 from Denmark.
RESULTS: Although in all 4 sites most surgeons reported that they performed A-scanning, fundus examination, and refraction routinely before surgery, significant crossnational variation was observed in preoperative ophthalmic and medical testing. While preoperative medical tests were virtually unused in Denmark, they were widely used in the other sites. A significantly higher proportion of the surgeons in the United States and Barcelona reported that they performed less than 100 extractions per year compared with surgeons in Canada and Denmark (P < .001). A significantly higher proportion of the surgeons in the United States and Canada were performing predominantly phacoextraction compared with surgeons in Denmark and Barcelona (P < .001). Both within and across sites, considerable variation in number of follow-up visits and postoperative tests was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant international variation in the management of healthy patients with cataracts has been observed. If less intensive care is not associated with poorer outcomes, there is the potential for less costly care of patients with cataracts. Further research identifying the most cost-effective practices is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9076214     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150401014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  5 in total

1.  Use of vision tests in clinical decision making about cataract surgery: results of a national survey.

Authors:  N A Frost; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Clinical outcomes and costs of cataract surgery performed by planned ECCE and phacoemulsification.

Authors:  X Castells; M Comas; M Castilla; F Cots; S Alarcón
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  The Manitoba Cataract Waiting List Program.

Authors:  L Bellan; M Mathen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Focussing both eyes on health outcomes: revisiting cataract surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer C Davis; Heather McNeill; Michael Wasdell; Susan Chunick; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.

Authors:  José Ma Quintana; Antonio Escobar; Inmaculada Aróstegui
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.