Literature DB >> 9075745

A clinical trial to evaluate the worth of preoperative multimodality therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the rectum: a progress report of National Surgical Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03.

D M Hyams1, E P Mamounas, N Petrelli, H Rockette, J Jones, H S Wieand, M Deutsch, L Wickerham, B Fisher, N Wolmark.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03 was designed to determine the worth of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of operable rectal cancer.
METHODS: Thus far, 116 patients of an eventual 900 with primary operable rectal cancer have been randomized to receive multimodality therapy to begin preoperatively (59 patients) or identical therapy beginning after curative surgery (57). All patients received seven cycles of 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy. Cycles 1 and 4 through 7 used a high-dose weekly FU regimen. In Cycles 2 and 3, FU and low-dose LV chemotherapy was given during the first and fifth week of radiation therapy (5,040 cGy). The preoperative arm (Group 1) received the first three cycles of chemotherapy and all radiation therapy before surgery. The postoperative arm (Group 2) received all radiation and chemotherapy after surgery. Primary study end points included disease-free survival and survival. Secondary end points included local recurrence, primary tumor response to combination therapy, tumor downstaging, and sphincter preservation.
RESULTS: Overall treatment-related toxicity was similar in both groups. Although seven preoperative patients had events after randomization that precluded surgery, eight events occurred during an equivalent follow-up period in the postoperative group. No patient was deemed inoperable because of progressive local disease. Sphincter-saving surgery was intended in 31 percent of Group 1 patients and 33 percent of Group 2 patients at the time of randomization. Such surgery was actually performed in 50 percent of the preoperatively treated patients and 33 percent of the postoperatively treated patients. The use of protective colostomy in patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery and the development of perioperative complications in all surgical patients were similar in both groups. There was evidence of tumor downstaging in evaluable patients undergoing preoperative therapy, with 8 percent of Group 1 patients having had a pathologic complete response.
CONCLUSION: These data do suggest that the preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimen used are, at least, as safe and tolerable as standard postoperative treatment. There is presently a trend to tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation in the preoperative arm. Whether this arm will have greater or lesser survival and long-term toxicity awaits the completion of this relevant study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9075745     DOI: 10.1007/bf02054976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  59 in total

1.  Evaluating toxicity in neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Stefan Höcht
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Colorectal Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon Walsh; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Complications of perineal surgery.

Authors:  James W Ogilvie; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

Review 4.  Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection.

Authors:  Mohammad U Nasirkhan; Farshad Abir; Walter Longo; Robert Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Adjuvant chemotherapy with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer previously treated by preoperative radiochemotherapy and curative tumor resection.

Authors:  Bert Hildebrandt; Beate Rau; Jürgen Löffel; Peter Wust; Annett Nicolaou; Johanna Gellermann; Philipp Le Coutre; Peter Neuhaus; Roland Felix; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Bernd Dörken; Hanno Riess
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer after a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Jose M Enríquez-Navascués; Nerea Borda; Aintzane Lizerazu; Carlos Placer; Jose L Elosegui; Juan P Ciria; Adelaida Lacasta; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  SKP2 overexpression is associated with a poor prognosis of rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy and represents a therapeutic target with high potential.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Tian; Tzu-Ju Chen; Ching-Yih Lin; Li-Tzong Chen; Li-Ching Lin; Chung-Hsi Hsing; Sung-Wei Lee; Ming-Jen Sheu; Hao-Hsien Lee; Yow-Ling Shiue; Hsuan-Ying Huang; Hsin-Yi Pan; Chien-Feng Li; Shang-Hung Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-01-18

8.  Overexpression of ANXA1 confers independent negative prognostic impact in rectal cancers receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Ming-Jen Sheu; Chien-Feng Li; Ching-Yih Lin; Sung-Wei Lee; Li-Ching Lin; Tzu-Ju Chen; Li-Jung Ma
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-09

9.  The investigation of primary rectal cancer by surgeons: current pattern of practice.

Authors:  Todd P W McMullen; Alexandra M Easson; Zane Cohen; Carol J Swallow
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Wladimir Nadalin; Jorge Sabbaga; Ulysses Ribeiro; Afonso Henrique Silva e Sousa; Fábio Guilherme Campos; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.