BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to clarify the aetiology of apparent de novo HBV infection after liver transplantation. METHODS: Twenty out of 570 HBsAg negative patients (3.5%) became HBsAg positive after transplantation and were studied. Donor and recipient sera were retrospectively tested for HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc, and HBV DNA by PCR. Donor and recipient livers were tested for HBV DNA by PCR on paraffin-embedded tissue. RESULTS: Group 1: HBV infection of donor origin (eight patients): one donor serum was HBsAg positive, three were serum HBV DNA positive, four were liver HBV DNA positive. Group 2: reactivation of latent HBV infection (eight patients) with detection of HBV DNA in pretransplant serum (seven patients) or in native liver (one patient): three were anti-HBs positive, two anti-HBc positive, and three with fulminant hepatitis had no serological HBV markers. Group 3: undetermined origin (four patients) defined by absence of HBV DNA in pretransplant donor and/or recipient sera and liver; however, acquired infection was suspected from two anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive donors. Two patients became HBsAg negative, and five HBV DNA negative. One died from HBV-cirrhosis and two were retransplanted. In the others, the last histology showed cirrhosis (three), chronic hepatitis (nine), acute hepatitis (one), and non-specific change (four patients). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of de novo HBV infection in liver transplant patients was 3.5%; the aetiology was determined in 16/20 patients: from the donor in eight, and from the recipient in eight. One should be cautious when donors or recipients are anti-HBc or both anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to clarify the aetiology of apparent de novo HBV infection after liver transplantation. METHODS: Twenty out of 570 HBsAg negative patients (3.5%) became HBsAg positive after transplantation and were studied. Donor and recipient sera were retrospectively tested for HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc, and HBV DNA by PCR. Donor and recipient livers were tested for HBV DNA by PCR on paraffin-embedded tissue. RESULTS: Group 1: HBV infection of donor origin (eight patients): one donor serum was HBsAg positive, three were serum HBV DNA positive, four were liver HBV DNA positive. Group 2: reactivation of latent HBV infection (eight patients) with detection of HBV DNA in pretransplant serum (seven patients) or in native liver (one patient): three were anti-HBs positive, two anti-HBc positive, and three with fulminant hepatitis had no serological HBV markers. Group 3: undetermined origin (four patients) defined by absence of HBV DNA in pretransplant donor and/or recipient sera and liver; however, acquired infection was suspected from two anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive donors. Two patients became HBsAg negative, and five HBV DNA negative. One died from HBV-cirrhosis and two were retransplanted. In the others, the last histology showed cirrhosis (three), chronic hepatitis (nine), acute hepatitis (one), and non-specific change (four patients). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of de novo HBV infection in liver transplant patients was 3.5%; the aetiology was determined in 16/20 patients: from the donor in eight, and from the recipient in eight. One should be cautious when donors or recipients are anti-HBc or both anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive.
Authors: Rafael Barcena; Gloria Moraleda; Javier Moreno; M Dolores Martín; Emilio de Vicente; Jesús Nuño; M Luisa Mateos; Santos del Campo Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-04-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Tara N Palmore; Neeral L Shah; Rohit Loomba; Brian B Borg; Uri Lopatin; Jordan J Feld; Farooq Khokhar; Glen Lutchman; David E Kleiner; Neal S Young; Richard Childs; A John Barrett; T Jake Liang; Jay H Hoofnagle; Theo Heller Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Jae Hyun Han; Dong Goo Kim; Gun Hyung Na; Eun Young Kim; Soo Ho Lee; Tae Ho Hong; Young Kyoung You; Jong Young Choi; Seung Kew Yoon Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 1.859