Literature DB >> 9075448

A randomized controlled trial of a physician-directed treatment program for low-income patients with high blood cholesterol: the Southeast Cholesterol Project.

T C Keyserling1, A S Ammerman, C E Davis, M C Mok, J Garrett, R Simpson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a cholesterol-lowering intervention designed to facilitate the management of hypercholesterolemia by primary care clinicians.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial, with randomization of clinician-patient groups.
SETTING: Twenty-one community and rural health centers in North Carolina and Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care clinicians (n = 42, 71% physicians) and the patients they enrolled with high cholesterol (n = 372). Twenty-two clinicians were randomized to give the special intervention (184 patients) and 20 to give usual care (188 patients). Two thirds of participating patients were women, 40% were African American, and 11% were Native American. INTERVENTION: A 90-minute tutorial to train clinicians how to use a structured assessment and treatment program (Food for Heart Program) consisting of a brief dietary assessment and three 5- to 10-minute dietary counseling sessions given by the primary care clinician, referral to a local dietitian if the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remained elevated at 4-month follow-up, and a prompt for the clinician to consider lipid-lowering medication based on the LDL-C at 7-month follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in total and LDL cholesterol at 4-month follow-up and averaged over a 1-year follow-up period (4-, 7-, and 12-month follow-up).
RESULTS: At 4-month follow-up, total cholesterol decreased 0.33 mmol/L (12.6 mg/dL) in the intervention group and 0.21 mmol/L (8.3 mg/dL) in the control group: the difference was 0.11 mmol/L (4.2 mg/dL) (90% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to 0.24 mmol/L [-0.7 to 9.1 mg/dL]). The average reduction during the 1-year follow-up period was 0.09 mmol/L (3.6 mg/dL) greater in the intervention group (90% CI, -0.01 to 0.19 mmol/L [-0.3 to 7.5 mg/dL]). Eight percent of intervention patients were taking lipid-lowering medication at follow-up visits compared with 15% of control patients. In a subgroup analysis restricted to the 89% of returnees who were not taking lipid-lowering medication, the reduction in total cholesterol at 4-month follow-up was 0.14 mmol/L (5.5 mg/dL) greater in the intervention group (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.28 mmol/L [0.3 to 10.7 mg/dL]); averaged over 1 year, it was 0.14 mmol/L (5.3 mg/dL) greater (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.24 mmol/L [1.2 to 9.4 mg/dL]). Changes in LDL-C were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Total cholesterol and LDL-C decreased more in the intervention group than in the control group. Overall, the difference in lipid reduction between groups was modest and of borderline statistical significance; among participants who did not take lipid-lowering medication during follow-up, the difference in lipid reduction between groups was larger. We conclude that primary care clinicians can be trained to give a cholesterol-lowering intervention to low-income patients that results in modest, short-term reductions in total cholesterol and LDL-C.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9075448     DOI: 10.1001/archfami.6.2.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Fam Med        ISSN: 1063-3987


  16 in total

1.  A community-based, culturally relevant intervention to promote healthy eating and physical activity among middle-aged African American women in rural Alabama: findings from a group randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Isabel C Scarinci; Artisha Moore; Theresa Wynn-Wallace; Andrea Cherrington; Mona Fouad; Yufeng Li
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Cardiovascular health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.

Authors:  Andrew M Davis; Lisa M Vinci; Tochi M Okwuosa; Ayana R Chase; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Heart Healthy and Ethnically Relevant (HHER) Lifestyle trial for improving diet and physical activity in underserved African American women.

Authors:  Deborah Parra-Medina; Sara Wilcox; Dawn K Wilson; Cheryl L Addy; Gwen Felton; Mary Beth Poston
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Interventions to promote physical activity and dietary lifestyle changes for cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Nancy T Artinian; Gerald F Fletcher; Dariush Mozaffarian; Penny Kris-Etherton; Linda Van Horn; Alice H Lichtenstein; Shiriki Kumanyika; William E Kraus; Jerome L Fleg; Nancy S Redeker; Janet C Meininger; Joanne Banks; Eileen M Stuart-Shor; Barbara J Fletcher; Todd D Miller; Suzanne Hughes; Lynne T Braun; Laurie A Kopin; Kathy Berra; Laura L Hayman; Linda J Ewing; Philip A Ades; J Larry Durstine; Nancy Houston-Miller; Lora E Burke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Behavioral strategies for cardiovascular risk reduction in diverse and underserved racial/ethnic groups.

Authors:  Eileen M Stuart-Shor; Kathy A Berra; Mercy W Kamau; Shiriki K Kumanyika
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering medication.

Authors:  Mieke L van Driel; Michael D Morledge; Robin Ulep; Johnathon P Shaffer; Philippa Davies; Richard Deichmann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-21

7.  Adoption and implementation of physical activity and dietary counseling by community health center providers and nurses.

Authors:  Sara Wilcox; Deborah Parra-Medina; Gwen M Felton; Mary Beth Poston; Amanda McClain
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2010-09

8.  Results of the Heart Healthy and Ethnically Relevant Lifestyle trial: a cardiovascular risk reduction intervention for African American women attending community health centers.

Authors:  Deborah Parra-Medina; Sara Wilcox; Jennifer Salinas; Cheryl Addy; Elizabeth Fore; Marybeth Poston; Dawn K Wilson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  Philippa Davies; Anne E Walker; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Designing and implementing a comparative effectiveness study of two strategies for delivering high quality CHD prevention: methods and participant characteristics for the Heart to Health study.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Lindy B Draeger; Michael P Pignone; Philip D Sloane; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Eric A Finkelstein; Ziya Gizlice; Maihan B Vu; Daniel P Gitterman; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Katrina E Donahue; Kelly Evenson; Alice S Ammerman; Thomas C Keyserling
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.