Literature DB >> 9074868

Principles for the selection of doses in chronic rodent bioassays. ILSI Risk Science Working Group on Dose Selection.

J A Foran1.   

Abstract

Dose selection in chronic rodent bioassays has been one of the most debated issues in risk assessment. The Committee on Risk Assessment Methods of the National Research Council attempted, but failed, in 1993 to reach consensus on how to select doses for chronic rodent bioassays. However, a more recent effort conducted by the ILSI Risk Science Institute has resulted in a consensus set of principles for dose selection, including selection of the highest dose for chronic rodent bioassays. The principles encourage a move away from sole reliance on a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), as it has been traditionally defined (primarily by body weight and histopathology), and toward the use of sound scientific and toxicologic principles for the selection of all doses in the chronic bioassay. Specifically, the principles recommend that dose selection for chronic studies must be based on sound toxicologic principles; dose selection should consider human exposure; dose selection should be based on a variety of endpoints and effects derived from prechronic studies; and dose selection should consider physicochemical and other factors. Implementation of the principles internationally will have two important benefits; improvement in the quality and consistency of the rodent bioassay and international harmonization of dose selection procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9074868      PMCID: PMC1469843          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.105-1469843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  3 in total

1.  IFSTP guidelines for the design and interpretation of the chronic rodent carcinogenicity bioassay.

Authors:  J M Faccini; W R Butler; J C Friedmann; R Hess; G K Reznik; N Ito; Y Hayashi; G M Williams
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  1992-12

2.  Historical review of the rodent bioassay and future directions.

Authors:  E E McConnell
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  The relationship between use of the maximum tolerated dose and study sensitivity for detecting rodent carcinogenicity.

Authors:  J K Haseman; A Lockhart
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1994-04
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Opportunities and challenges related to saturation of toxicokinetic processes: Implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Tan; Hugh A Barton; Alan Boobis; Rachel Brunner; Harvey Clewell; Rhian Cope; Jeffrey Dawson; Jeanne Domoradzki; Peter Egeghy; Pankaj Gulati; Brandall Ingle; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kelly Lowe; Anna Lowit; Elizabeth Mendez; David Miller; Jeffrey Minucci; James Nguyen; Alicia Paini; Monique Perron; Katherine Phillips; Hua Qian; Tharacad Ramanarayanan; Fiona Sewell; Philip Villanueva; John Wambaugh; Michelle Embry
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for ethyl tertiary-butyl ether and tertiary-butyl alcohol in rats: Contribution of binding to α2u-globulin in male rats and high-exposure nonlinear kinetics to toxicity and cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Susan J Borghoff; Caroline Ring; Marcy I Banton; Teresa L Leavens
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.446

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.