Literature DB >> 9072026

Preventive effectiveness of pre-employment medical assessments.

W de Kort1, F van Dijk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Health gain, prevention of health loss, and avoidance of financial risk all seem to be driving forces for the use of pre-employment medical assessment. An attempt is made to measure the effect of implementing the pre-employment medical assessment on these end points. The anticipated maximum preventive effect (preventive effectiveness) of selection by means of pre-employment medical assessments for work related risks and the potential for disablement in individual workers can be calculated or estimated. Necessary parameters include test validity characteristics and epidemiological data for both the adverse outcome to be prevented, and risk factors of concern.
RESULTS: The preventive effectiveness can be expressed as the effort (number of actions) needed to prevent one adverse event-for example, one case of occupational disease or one case of long term disablement. Actions include: a pre-employment health assessment, rejection of the candidate, individual precautions, adjustments of the job, and adjustments of the job environment. It seems that the preventive effectiveness of many actions can be low, implying that large numbers of actions are needed to prevent one adverse outcome. DISCUSSION: The medical assessment should consist of no more questions and tests than are required relevant to the stated aim. Particularly, when the pre-employment medical assessment is used to reject candidates at risk, the use of tests should be carefully weighed. If the preventive effectiveness is considered to be too low, then the question or test should not be incorporated for selection purposes. The application of a so called "expert judgment" should be based on professional guidelines wherever possible and should be made clear. The benefit of reducing the incidence of a serious adverse event by one may outweigh the costs of rejecting many candidates.
CONCLUSIONS: The concept of preventive effectiveness may help to reach evidence based occupational medicine, which starts at the pre-employment medical assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9072026      PMCID: PMC1128627          DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  8 in total

1.  Agreement on medical fitness for a job.

Authors:  W L de Kort; H W Uiterweer; F J van Dijk
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Preemployment medical examinations in a large occupational health service.

Authors:  W L de Kort; L G Fransman; F J van Dijk
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  The role of medical examination in protecting worker health.

Authors:  R S Schilling
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-08

4.  Medical screening in the workplace: proposed principles.

Authors:  W E Halperin; J Ratcliffe; T M Frazier; L Wilson; S P Becker; P A Schulte
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-08

5.  Audit of pre-employment assessments by occupational health departments in the National Health Service.

Authors:  S Whitaker; T C Aw
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Quality assessment of occupational health services instruments.

Authors:  F J van Dijk; W L de Kort; J H Verbeek
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.611

7.  Developing job-related preplacement medical examinations.

Authors:  J C Hogan; E J Bernacki
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1981-07

8.  Human rights versus occupational medicine.

Authors:  G Atherley
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.663

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of pre-employment screening.

Authors:  Bas Sorgdrager; Carel T J Hulshof; Frank J H van Dijk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  The physical performance of workers on offshore wind energy platforms: is pre-employment fitness testing necessary and fair?

Authors:  Alexandra M Preisser; Rosalie V McDonough; Volker Harth
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Criteria and methods used for the assessment of fitness for work: a systematic review.

Authors:  Consol Serra; Mari Cruz Rodriguez; George L Delclos; Manel Plana; Luis I Gómez López; Fernando G Benavides
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Evidence base for pre-employment medical screening.

Authors:  Joseph Pachman
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Postoffer Pre-Placement Screening for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Newly Hired Manufacturing Workers.

Authors:  Ann Marie Dale; Bethany T Gardner; Skye Buckner-Petty; Jaime R Strickland; Bradley Evanoff
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Modeling the cost-benefit of nerve conduction studies in pre-employment screening for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Bradley Evanoff; Steve Kymes
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  The effectiveness of post-offer pre-placement nerve conduction screening for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Ann Marie Dale; Bethany T Gardner; Angelique Zeringue; Robert Werner; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley Evanoff
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 8.  Pre-employment examinations for preventing injury, disease and sick leave in workers.

Authors:  Frederieke G Schaafsma; Norashikin Mahmud; Michiel F Reneman; Jean-Baptiste Fassier; Franciscus H W Jungbauer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.