Literature DB >> 9071322

Intracellular accumulation of rhodamine 110 in single living cells.

V Jeannot1, J M Salmon, M Deumié, P Viallet.   

Abstract

To gain a better understanding of the internalization of rhodamines, vital staining of living cells in situ by two different rhodamines, R110 and R123, was studied by microfluorometry. These dyes differ strongly in their lipophilic properties because of differences in charge distribution. Microspectrofluorometry was used to study the fluorescence emission spectra of R110-loaded cells to determine reliable loading conditions. Cell uptake and cell efflux studies of R110 were performed by numerical microfluorescence imaging. A slower uptake was observed for R110 (14 hr) vs R123 (2 hr), but the R110 efflux was much more rapid (30 min) than that of R123 (> 24 hr). Although it appeared in the R110 and R123 co-localization study that R110 was able to accumulate in mitochondria, labeling with R110 was lower than with R123. Our results indicate that, rhodamine 110 in its acid cationic form is able to cross the plasma and mitochondrial membrane and to accumulate in cell compartments as does the cationic rhodamine 123. However, because of its acido-basic properties, R110 should be able to decrease the pH of cell compartments, depending on their ability to regulate pH. In such a model, mitochondrial pH should be more greatly decreased than cytosolic pH, leading to a lower mitochondrial accumulation of R110 than of R123. Surprisingly, these effects, which should affect the energetic state of mitochondria, do not influence cell growth, because no cytotoxic effect was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9071322     DOI: 10.1177/002215549704500308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  3 in total

1.  Flux of ionic dyes across microneedle-treated skin: effect of molecular characteristics.

Authors:  Yasmine A Gomaa; Martin J Garland; Fiona J McInnes; Ryan F Donnelly; Labiba K El-Khordagui; Clive G Wilson
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.875

2.  Comparison of Chemotherapeutic Activities of Rhodamine-Based GUMBOS and NanoGUMBOS.

Authors:  Nimisha Bhattarai; Mi Chen; Rocío L Pérez; Sudhir Ravula; Robert M Strongin; Karen McDonough; Isiah M Warner
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Measurement of separase proteolytic activity in single living cells by a fluorogenic flow cytometry assay.

Authors:  Wiltrud Haaß; Helga Kleiner; Martin C Müller; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Alice Fabarius; Wolfgang Seifarth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.