Literature DB >> 9071317

Comparison of immunologic amplification vs enzymatic deposition of fluorochrome-conjugated tyramide as detection systems for FISH.

P T Macechko1, L Krueger, B Hirsch, S L Erlandsen.   

Abstract

Using various sizes and dilutions of hapten-conjugated DNA probes, we compared catalyzed reporter deposition (CARD) to fluorochrome-conjugated antibody layering (immunological method) for amplifying FISH signals. Cosmid and phage probes that contained human DNA inserts of 40 KB and 15 KB, respectively, and were mapped to chromosome 15q11.2 were used to evaluate these amplification methods. The probes were used either at standard concentrations (10 ng/microliter) or at dilutions up to 1:40 (0.25 ng/microliter). Detection of FISH signals using either immunological (three antibody layers) or CARD methods were comparable when the undiluted (10 ng/microliter) or 1:4 dilution (2.5 ng/microliter) of the cosmid probe was used. Use of a single fluorochrome-conjugated antibody layer produced very weak FISH signals. However, addition of an unlabeled secondary antibody followed by a third antibody conjugated to the same fluorochrome (i.e., two rounds of amplification) produced a strong signal that was detected at a 1:4 probe dilution but was not successfully detected at probe dilutions of 1:10 or greater. In contrast, intense probe signals were produced with the CARD method at all probe dilutions, particularly when coupled to extended hapten-antibody incubation times. The 15-KB phage probe was difficult to detect at a 1:4 dilution with the standard immunologic amplification methods but was readily detected with the CARD method. These data suggest that CARD may be useful for FISH in that (a) less probe may be needed and therefore valuable probe reagents may be conserved, and (b) smaller targets may be detected, thus extending the range of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9071317     DOI: 10.1177/002215549704500303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  6 in total

1.  Rapid in situ codetection of noncoding RNAs and proteins in cells and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections without protease treatment.

Authors:  Mariàngels de Planell-Saguer; María Celina Rodicio; Zissimos Mourelatos
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Quantitative in situ analysis of FoxP3+ T regulatory cells on transplant tissue using laser scanning cytometry.

Authors:  Hidenori Takahashi; Phillip Ruiz; Camillo Ricordi; Victor Delacruz; Atsushi Miki; Atsuyoshi Mita; Ryosuke Misawa; Scott Barker; George W Burke; Andreas G Tzakis; Hirohito Ichii
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Atto 465 Derivative Is a Nuclear Stain with Unique Excitation and Emission Spectra Useful for Multiplex Immunofluorescence Histochemistry.

Authors:  Joshua T Dodge; Andrew D Doyle; Ana C Costa-da-Silva; Christopher T Hogden; Eva Mezey; Jacqueline W Mays
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Next-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: higher gain, lower cost, greater durability.

Authors:  Harry M T Choi; Victor A Beck; Niles A Pierce
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Hybridization chain reaction enables a unified approach to multiplexed, quantitative, high-resolution immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Maayan Schwarzkopf; Mike C Liu; Samuel J Schulte; Rachel Ives; Naeem Husain; Harry M T Choi; Niles A Pierce
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Characterization of GABAergic neurons in the mouse lateral septum: a double fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical study using tyramide signal amplification.

Authors:  Changjiu Zhao; Brian Eisinger; Stephen C Gammie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.