PURPOSE: The steady-state pharmacokinetics of valproate (VPA) and topiramate (TPM) were compared during VPA monotherapy, concomitant VPA and TPM therapy, and TPM monotherapy to evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions. METHODS: After a 3-week baseline period, 12 patients receiving VPA monotherapy (500 to 2,250 mg every 12 h) received TPM at three escalating doses (from 100 to 200 to 400 mg every 12 h), each for 2 weeks. Thereafter, the VPA dose was tapered by 25% weekly. Blood and urine samples were collected over 12-h intervals during VPA monotherapy and at the end of each stage of TPM dose escalation and TPM monotherapy. RESULTS: All patients reached TPM monotherapy, and nine achieved satisfactory seizure control for > or = 2 weeks without VPA. TPM plasma peak concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-versus-time curve during a 12-h dosing interval (AUC(0-12)) were slightly higher (17%; n = 8) during TPM monotherapy than during concomitant VPA therapy. TPM oral and renal clearances (n = 8) were 25.9 +/- 4.6 and 11.6 +/- 3.2 ml/min during TPM monotherapy and were 29.8 +/- 4.2 and 12.4 +/- 2.7 ml/min during VPA concomitant therapy. VPA AUC(0-12) decreased (11.3%; n = 10) with the addition of TPM 400 mg every 12 h. VPA oral clearance was 12.8 +/- 4.1 ml/min during monotherapy and was 13.8 +/- 4.0, 14.1 +/- 3.9, and 14.5 +/- 5.2 ml/min during coadministration of TPM 100, 200, and 400 mg every 12 h, respectively. Cognitive dysfunction, observed in some patients receiving high doses of VPA with TPM, reversed or improved with VPA dose reduction and discontinuation. The lower-than-normal prestudy platelet count measured in one patient increased to normal levels when VPA was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Because changes in TPM and VPA pharmacokinetics were small, it is unlikely that their concomitant use will have a significant impact on the clinical condition of the patient.
PURPOSE: The steady-state pharmacokinetics of valproate (VPA) and topiramate (TPM) were compared during VPA monotherapy, concomitant VPA and TPM therapy, and TPM monotherapy to evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions. METHODS: After a 3-week baseline period, 12 patients receiving VPA monotherapy (500 to 2,250 mg every 12 h) received TPM at three escalating doses (from 100 to 200 to 400 mg every 12 h), each for 2 weeks. Thereafter, the VPA dose was tapered by 25% weekly. Blood and urine samples were collected over 12-h intervals during VPA monotherapy and at the end of each stage of TPM dose escalation and TPM monotherapy. RESULTS: All patients reached TPM monotherapy, and nine achieved satisfactory seizure control for > or = 2 weeks without VPA. TPM plasma peak concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-versus-time curve during a 12-h dosing interval (AUC(0-12)) were slightly higher (17%; n = 8) during TPM monotherapy than during concomitant VPA therapy. TPM oral and renal clearances (n = 8) were 25.9 +/- 4.6 and 11.6 +/- 3.2 ml/min during TPM monotherapy and were 29.8 +/- 4.2 and 12.4 +/- 2.7 ml/min during VPA concomitant therapy. VPA AUC(0-12) decreased (11.3%; n = 10) with the addition of TPM 400 mg every 12 h. VPA oral clearance was 12.8 +/- 4.1 ml/min during monotherapy and was 13.8 +/- 4.0, 14.1 +/- 3.9, and 14.5 +/- 5.2 ml/min during coadministration of TPM 100, 200, and 400 mg every 12 h, respectively. Cognitive dysfunction, observed in some patients receiving high doses of VPA with TPM, reversed or improved with VPA dose reduction and discontinuation. The lower-than-normal prestudy platelet count measured in one patient increased to normal levels when VPA was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Because changes in TPM and VPA pharmacokinetics were small, it is unlikely that their concomitant use will have a significant impact on the clinical condition of the patient.
Authors: Meir Bialer; Dennis R Doose; Bindu Murthy; Christopher Curtin; Shean-Sheng Wang; Roy E Twyman; Stefan Schwabe Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.447