Literature DB >> 9069740

Analysis of the measurement of four wound variables in elderly patients with pressure ulcers.

V Schubert1, M Zander.   

Abstract

The suitability of four different methods for measuring pressure ulcer size was investigated during 10 consecutive weeks in a group of 11 elderly patients. The methods used were: 1. Volume measurement by filling the wound cavity with a gel 2. area measurement, by tracing the wound boundary outlined on transparent film with a digital planimeter 3. perimeter measurement, by tracing the wound boundary outlined on transparent film with a digital measuring pen 4. depth measurement using a millimeter probe. The mean values of the rate parameters for volume, area, perimeter, and depth were approximately in the proportions 3:2:1:1, which mirrors the inherent geometric dimensions of the corresponding variables. The methods used for measuring perimeter and depth were less reliable than the methods used for measuring volume and area. Thus, the use of both volume and area measurements in recommended. The former is best suited for deep ulcers and the latter for broad, irregularly shaped ulcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9069740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care        ISSN: 1076-2191            Impact factor:   4.730


  2 in total

Review 1.  Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.

Authors:  Line Bisgaard Jørgensen; Jens A Sørensen; Gregor Be Jemec; Knud B Yderstraede
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Device for Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Guilherme Pena; Beatrice Kuang; Zygmunt Szpak; Prue Cowled; Joseph Dawson; Robert Fitridge
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.730

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.