Literature DB >> 9069627

The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da.

B A Martin1, A Sigal, D Kurtzberg, D R Stapells.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) N1, N2, and P3 to the speech sounds /ba/and/da/presented at 65 and 80 dB SPL. Normal-hearing subjects pressed a button in response to the deviant sound in an oddball paradigm. Broadband masking noise was presented at an intensity sufficient to completely mask the response to the 65-dB SPL speech sounds, and subsequently high-pass filtered at 4000, 2000, 1000, 500, and 250 Hz. With high-pass masking noise, pure-tone behavioral thresholds increased by an average of 38 dB at the high-pass cutoff and by 50 dB one octave above the cutoff frequency. Results show that as the cutoff frequency of the high-pass masker was lowered, ERP latencies to speech sounds increased and amplitudes decreased. The cutoff frequency where these changes first occurred and the rate of the change differed for N1 compared to N2, P3, and the behavioral measures. N1 showed gradual changes as the masker cutoff frequency was lowered. N2, P3, and behavioral measures showed marked changes below a masker cutoff of 2000 Hz. These results indicate that the decreased audibility resulting from the noise masking affects the various ERP components in a differential manner. N1 is related to the presence of audible stimulus energy, being present whether audible stimuli are discriminable or not. In contrast, N2 and P3 were absent when the stimuli were audible but not discriminable (i.e., when the second formant transitions were masked), reflecting stimulus discrimination. These data have implications regarding the effects of decreased audibility on cortical processing of speech sounds and for the study of cortical ERPs in populations with hearing impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9069627     DOI: 10.1121/1.418146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Learning impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Krista L Johnson; Erin A Hayes; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural dynamics of phonological processing in the dorsal auditory stream.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Merav Sabri; Scott A Beardsley; Jain Mangalathu-Arumana; Anjali Desai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Event-related potentials reflect spectral differences in speech and non-speech stimuli in children and adults.

Authors:  R Ceponiene; M Torki; P Alku; A Koyama; J Townsend
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Neural encoding and perception of speech signals in informational masking.

Authors:  Keri O'Connell Bennett; Curtis J Billings; Michelle R Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Neural Plasticity Induced by Hearing Aid Use.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.702

6.  Sensitivity of the human auditory cortex to acoustic degradation of speech and non-speech sounds.

Authors:  Ismo Miettinen; Hannu Tiitinen; Paavo Alku; Patrick J C May
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Effects of background noise on cortical encoding of speech in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Steven Zecker; Barbara Trommer; Julia Chen; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2009-04-08

8.  Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Tina M Penman; Garnett P McMillan; Emily M Ellis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Do resting brain dynamics predict oddball evoked-potential?

Authors:  Tien-Wen Lee; Younger W-Y Yu; Hung-Chi Wu; Tai-Jui Chen
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Slow cortical potentials and amplification-part I: n1-p2 measures.

Authors:  Susan Marynewich; Lorienne M Jenstad; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.