Literature DB >> 9069320

Consistency of three-dimensional planning target volumes across physicians and institutions.

C H Ketting1, M Austin-Seymour, I Kalet, J Unger, S Hummel, J Jacky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional treatment planning depends upon exact and consistent delineation of target volumes. This study tested whether different physicians from different institutions vary significantly in their creation of planning target volumes (PTVs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight physicians from three different institutions created partial planning target volumes for nine clinical test cases. Their target volumes were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Quantitative results were tested for significant differences.
RESULTS: Qualitative analysis showed the physicians to vary in (a) the margin placed around the clinical target volume, (b) the margin used near critical structures, and (c) handling of concavities in the clinical target volume. Quantitative analysis showed these variations to result in statistically significant differences in the measured volume of the physicians' planning target volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: Individual physicians and institutions differ significantly in their creation of planning target volumes, suggesting individual and institutional differences in the working definition for the PTV. Implications of this fact are discussed, along with areas where standardization can be improved.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9069320     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00459-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Cost-benefit analysis of 3D conformal radiation therapy.

Authors:  S H Levitt; F M Khan; P D Higgins; M B Nierengarten
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Using an artificial neural network to define the planning target volume in radiotherapy.

Authors:  N Kaspari; B Michaelis; G Gademann
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  The use of medical images in planning and delivery of radiation therapy.

Authors:  I J Kalet; M M Austin-Seymour
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  A simple method of evaluating margin-growing accuracy in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Fu Jin; Juan Zhou; Huanli Luo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Remarks on reporting and recording consistent with the ICRU reference dose.

Authors:  Klaus Bratengeier; Markus Oechsner; Mark Gainey; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Target volume delineation and margins in the management of lung cancers in the era of image guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Robert Lin
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-02-24

7.  CT slice index and thickness: impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  E Berthelet; M Liu; P Truong; P Czaykowski; N Kalach; C Yu; K Patterson; T Currie; S Kristensen; W Kwan; V Moravan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.