Literature DB >> 9065838

Three-dimensional model of the human eye-head saccadic system.

D Tweed1.   

Abstract

Current theories of eye-head gaze shifts deal only with one-dimensional motion, and do not touch on three-dimensional (3-D) issues such as curvature and Donders' laws. I show that recent 3-D data can be explained by a model based on ideas that are well established from one-dimensional studies, with just one new assumption: that the eye is driven toward a 3-D orientation in space that has been chosen so that Listing's law of the eye in head will hold when the eye-head movement is complete. As in previous, one-dimensional models, the eye and head are feedback-guided and the commands specifying desired eye position eye pass through a neural "saturation" so as to stay within the effective oculomotor range. The model correctly predicts the complex, 3-D trajectories of the head, eye in space, and eye in head in a variety of saccade tasks. And when it moves repeatedly to the same target, varying the contributions of eye and head, the model lands in different eye-in-space positions, but these positions differ only in their cyclotorsion about the line of sight, so they all point that line at the target-a behavior also seen in real eye-head saccades. Between movements the model obeys Listing's law of the eye in head and Donders' law of the head on torso, but during certain gaze shifts involving large torsional head movements, it shows marked, 8 degrees deviations from Listing's law. These deviations are the most important untested predictions of the theory. Their experimental refutation would sink the model, whereas confirmation would strongly support its central claim that the eye moves toward a 3-D position in space chosen to obey Listing's law and, therefore, that a Listing operator exists upstream from the eye pulse generator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9065838     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.2.654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory.

Authors:  W Pieter Medendorp; Douglas B Tweed; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Intrinsic joint kinematic planning. I: reassessing the Listing's law constraint in the control of three-dimensional arm movements.

Authors:  D G Liebermann; A Biess; J Friedman; C C A M Gielen; T Flash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Kinematics of vertical saccades during the yaw vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane; Junru Tian; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Coupling between horizontal and vertical components of saccadic eye movements during constant amplitude and direction gaze shifts in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  Edward G Freedman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Decisions in motion: vestibular contributions to saccadic target selection.

Authors:  L Rincon-Gonzalez; L P J Selen; K Halfwerk; M Koppen; B D Corneil; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Temporal dynamics of ocular position dependence of the initial human vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane; Junru Tian; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Hierarchical control of two-dimensional gaze saccades.

Authors:  Pierre M Daye; Lance M Optican; Gunnar Blohm; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Simulating the cortical 3D visuomotor transformation of reach depth.

Authors:  Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modeling auditory-visual evoked eye-head gaze shifts in dynamic multisteps.

Authors:  Bahadir Kasap; A John van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Latitude and longitude vertical disparities.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Graeme P Phillipson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.