Literature DB >> 9065062

Impacted graft incorporation after cemented acetabular revision. Histological evaluation in 8 patients.

P Buma1, N Lamerigts, B W Schreurs, J Gardeniers, D Versleyen, T J Slooff.   

Abstract

We took core biopsies from the acetabulum in 8 patients (at reoperation) after a previous revision with impacted cancellous allograft chips in combination with cement. Except for one biopsy specimen, the graft showed different stages of incorporation. In the specimens taken at 4 months, revascularization of the graft was found. Osteoclasts had removed parts of the graft, while woven bone had formed on the remnants of the graft and in the stroma that was invading the graft. Subsequent specimens showed that this mixture of graft and new bone was in due time remodeled into a normal trabecular bony structure with viable bone marrow that contained little or no remnants of the original graft. The graft-cement interface was present in 4 biopsies taken at 1, 22, 28, and 72 months. The specimen obtained 28 months after revision showed vital bone locally in direct contact with the cement layer; however, a soft tissue interface predominated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9065062     DOI: 10.3109/17453679608997751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  14 in total

1.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights(®): THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement.

Authors:  E Drampalos; A Fadulelmola; R Mohammed; D Shaw; S Subramanian; K D Jain; J Hodgkinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The combined effect of parathyroid hormone and bone graft on implant fixation.

Authors:  H Daugaard; B Elmengaard; T T Andreassen; J Baas; J E Bechtold; K Soballe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

Review 5.  Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco D'Apolito; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Rosario Madero; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The Exeter method-acetabular impaction grafting with cemented reimplantation.

Authors:  T G Petheram; J R Howell
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Microparticulate cortical allograft: an alternative to autograft in the treatment of osseous defects.

Authors:  H Thomas Temple; Theodore I Malinin
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-05-14

9.  Bone defects following curettage do not necessarily need augmentation.

Authors:  Martti Hirn; Uday de Silva; Sujith Sidharthan; Robert J Grimer; Adesegun Abudu; Roger M Tillman; Simon R Carter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Is an impacted morselized graft in a cage an alternative for reconstructing segmental diaphyseal defects?

Authors:  Pieter H J Bullens; H W Bart Schreuder; Maarten C de Waal Malefijt; Nico Verdonschot; Pieter Buma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.