Literature DB >> 9063042

Capacities of hospitalized, medically ill patients to consent to treatment.

P S Appelbaum1, T Grisso.   

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the abilities of hospitalized, medically ill patients with non-ill comparison subjects to engage in an informed consent process. Eighty-two inpatients under the age of 70 were recruited from patients admitted for evaluation or treatment of ischemic heart disease (N = 675). The comparison subjects (n = 82) were matched person-to-person on age, gender, race, educational level, and occupation and did not have histories of ischemic heart disease. The hospitalized subjects did not differ from the non-ill comparison subjects on three instruments developed to assess abilities related to decision-making competence. Demographic and mental state variables did not correlate with performance, except for verbal cognitive functioning. There is no reason to believe that hospitalized patients similar to this sample--even if being treated for potentially life-threatening conditions--are at increased risk of inability to engage in a meaningful informed consent process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9063042     DOI: 10.1016/S0033-3182(97)71480-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosomatics        ISSN: 0033-3182            Impact factor:   2.386


  7 in total

1.  Ethical issues for the consultant in the general hospital.

Authors:  D Ramchandani
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Capacity to make medical treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis: a potentially remediable deficit.

Authors:  Michael R Basso; Philip J Candilis; Jay Johnson; Courtney Ghormley; Dennis R Combs; Taeh Ward
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  A direct comparison of research decision-making capacity: schizophrenia/schizoaffective, medically ill, and non-ill subjects.

Authors:  Philip J Candilis; Kenneth E Fletcher; Cynthia M A Geppert; Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  What are the ethical issues in relation to the role of the family in intensive care?

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Quenot; Fiona Ecarnot; Nicolas Meunier-Beillard; Auguste Dargent; Audrey Large; Pascal Andreu; Jean-Philippe Rigaud
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 5.  Criteria for patient decision making (in)competence: a review of and commentary on some empirical approaches.

Authors:  S P Welie
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

6.  Informed consent prior to coronary angiography in a real world scenario: what do patients remember?

Authors:  Aslihan Eran; Erland Erdmann; Fikret Er
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Mental capacity, legal competence and consent to treatment.

Authors:  Alec Buchanan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 18.000

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.