Literature DB >> 9062440

A validation of the concept of current perceived health and the Current Perceived Health-42 (CPH-42) questionnaire.

R Fielding1, J Li.   

Abstract

Perceived or self-rated general health in its trait form reliably predicts subsequent mortality among certain sections of the community. In an investigation of the predictive value of health status at the time of assessment, 574 cases drawn from five groups (police trainees, firemen, students, out-patients and in-patients) were used to validate what we have called current perceived health (CPH) and the CPH-42, a measure of CPH is described. Results indicate those rating CPH as poorer were more likely to consult a doctor (chi 2 = 45.9, df = 1, p < 0.0000) and use medication (chi 2 = 61.0, df = 1, p < 0.0000). In comparison, general perceived health ratings did not predict either consultation or medication use. The instrument has good psychometric properties, with high divergent validity from general mental health and general health, with a Guttman split-half reliability > 0.79. Discriminant analysis using the CPH-2 achieved high correct classification rates (up to 100%). Comparison of a scoring method based on canonical coefficients (83% correct classification) with that based on summative scores (74% correct classification) indicate the former method to be more accurate. Age, and among people 40 years or older, gender were significant independent predictors of current perceived health status, with older people rating their current health less positively than younger, and females over 40 years rating their current health less positively than their male counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9062440     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026413427599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  9 in total

1.  A reformulation of quality of life for medical science.

Authors:  M E Hyland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Self-rated health and mortality in the NHANES-I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study.

Authors:  E L Idler; R J Angel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Validation of 30- and 12-item versions of the Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ) in patients admitted for general health screening.

Authors:  M Y Chong; G Wilkinson
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.

Authors:  S M Hunt; J McEwen; S P McKenna
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-04

5.  Health care utilization as a function of subjective health status, job satisfaction and gender among health care workers in Guangzhou, southern China.

Authors:  R Fielding; J Li; Y E Tang
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; V F Hillier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 7.  Depression and acute myocardial infarction: a review and reinterpretation.

Authors:  R Fielding
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The measurement of current perceived health among Chinese people in Guangzhou and Hong Kong, southern China.

Authors:  J Li; R Fielding
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Self-evaluated health and mortality among the elderly in New Haven, Connecticut, and Iowa and Washington counties, Iowa, 1982-1986.

Authors:  E L Idler; S V Kasl; J H Lemke
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.897

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Measurement of clinically relevant functional health perceptions in patients with whiplash-associated disorders: the development of the whiplash specific activity and participation list (WAL).

Authors:  Maarten A Schmitt; Martijn S Stenneberg; Patrick P M Schrama; Nico L U van Meeteren; Paul J M Helders; Carin D Schröder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  'In general, how do you feel today?'--self-rated health in the context of aging in India.

Authors:  Siddhivinayak Hirve
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.