M J Torrey1, J C Poen, R T Hoppe. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, CA, USA. margaret.torrey@mcrad.med.nyu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the costs and benefits of routine follow-up evaluation in patients treated with radiation therapy for early-stage Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined patterns of follow-up evaluation and methods of relapse detection among 709 patients with stage I and II Hodgkin's disease treated with primary radiotherapy between 1969 and 1994. We determined the probability of relapse detection for seven routine follow-up procedures, compared their relative costs, and determined the impact of each procedure on the likelihood of survival following salvage therapy. RESULTS: Relapse has occurred in 157 patients (22%) at a median 1.9 years (range, 0 to 13 years) posttreatment. Relapse was suspected primarily by history (Hx) in 55% of patients, physical examination (PE) in 14%, chest x-ray (CXR) in 23%, and abdominal x-ray (KUB) in 7%. Only one relapse (1%) was identified by a routine laboratory study. The rate of relapse detection was highest for a combination of Hx and PE (78 of 10,000 examinations) followed by CXR (26 of 10,000 examinations). The projected charges (1995 dollars) per relapse detected by routine follow-up Hx and PE were $11,000 compared with $68,000 for CXR and $142,000 for KUB. The 10-year actuarial survival rate following salvage therapy was 65% overall, 65% for patients in whom relapse was detected by Hx or PE, and 69% for patients in whom relapse was detected by radiographs (P = not significant). CONCLUSION: The majority of relapses occurred within 5 years of treatment and were identified by Hx and PE. CXR was useful during the first 3 years of follow-up evaluation. KUB, CBC, and laboratory studies accounted for nearly half of all follow-up charges and rarely led to the detection of relapse. Their routine use as a method of relapse detection is questionable. In general, the method of relapse detection did not have a significant impact on the likelihood of successful salvage therapy.
PURPOSE: To examine the costs and benefits of routine follow-up evaluation in patients treated with radiation therapy for early-stage Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined patterns of follow-up evaluation and methods of relapse detection among 709 patients with stage I and II Hodgkin's disease treated with primary radiotherapy between 1969 and 1994. We determined the probability of relapse detection for seven routine follow-up procedures, compared their relative costs, and determined the impact of each procedure on the likelihood of survival following salvage therapy. RESULTS: Relapse has occurred in 157 patients (22%) at a median 1.9 years (range, 0 to 13 years) posttreatment. Relapse was suspected primarily by history (Hx) in 55% of patients, physical examination (PE) in 14%, chest x-ray (CXR) in 23%, and abdominal x-ray (KUB) in 7%. Only one relapse (1%) was identified by a routine laboratory study. The rate of relapse detection was highest for a combination of Hx and PE (78 of 10,000 examinations) followed by CXR (26 of 10,000 examinations). The projected charges (1995 dollars) per relapse detected by routine follow-up Hx and PE were $11,000 compared with $68,000 for CXR and $142,000 for KUB. The 10-year actuarial survival rate following salvage therapy was 65% overall, 65% for patients in whom relapse was detected by Hx or PE, and 69% for patients in whom relapse was detected by radiographs (P = not significant). CONCLUSION: The majority of relapses occurred within 5 years of treatment and were identified by Hx and PE. CXR was useful during the first 3 years of follow-up evaluation. KUB, CBC, and laboratory studies accounted for nearly half of all follow-up charges and rarely led to the detection of relapse. Their routine use as a method of relapse detection is questionable. In general, the method of relapse detection did not have a significant impact on the likelihood of successful salvage therapy.
Authors: Stephan D Voss; Lu Chen; Louis S Constine; Allen Chauvenet; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Sue C Kaste; Thomas Slovis; Cindy L Schwartz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ajay K Gopal; Robert Chen; Scott E Smith; Stephen M Ansell; Joseph D Rosenblatt; Kerry J Savage; Joseph M Connors; Andreas Engert; Emily K Larsen; Xuedong Chi; Eric L Sievers; Anas Younes Journal: Blood Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly; Karen Juul Mylam; Peter Brown; Lena Specht; Ilse Christiansen; Lars Munksgaard; Hans Erik Johnsen; Annika Loft; Anne Bukh; Victor Iyer; Anne Lerberg Nielsen; Martin Hutchings Journal: Haematologica Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Alison M Friedmann; Julie A Wolfson; Melissa M Hudson; Howard J Weinstein; Michael P Link; Amy Billett; Eric C Larsen; Torunn Yock; Sarah S Donaldson; Karen Marcus; Matthew J Krasin; Scott C Howard; Monika L Metzger Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Ryan C Lynch; Vandana Sundaram; Manisha Desai; Solomon Henry; Douglas Wood; Sarah Daadi; Richard T Hoppe; Ranjana Advani Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-05-05