Literature DB >> 9060502

In vivo rotational stability of the kinematic rotating hinge knee prosthesis.

J M Kabo1, R S Yang, F J Dorey, J J Eckardt.   

Abstract

The in vivo rotary laxity and torsional stiffness of the knee joint were measured in 20 patients with wide intraarticular resection of the distal femoral tumor followed by reconstruction with a custom Kinematic rotating hinge endoprosthesis. The contralateral normal knee served as natural control. Twenty patients underwent 29 measurements, including 9 at the first year, 10 at the second year (4 of these also measured at year 1), and 10 at the third year (3 of these also measured at years 1 and 2; 2 also measured at year 2). The mean followup for the 15 survivors was 134 months (range, 102-156 months). The total rotatory laxity of the hinged knee was significantly greater than that of the contralateral knee. The torsional stiffness in external rotation of the hinged knee was 30.4% less than that of the contralateral knee in the first postoperative year, whereas the torsional stiffness in internal rotation was similar to that of the contralateral knee. Torsional stiffness of the hinged knee in the second year was significantly less than that of the contralateral knee whereas it was within the normal range of stiffness in the third year. The total rotatory laxity and torsional stiffness of the hinged knee in the early postoperative years could not predict the risk of late loosening. In vitro rotational stability of the rotating hinge device with axial load bearing was 6.7 and 8.1 Newton-meters (N-m) at 0 degrees and 20 degrees knee flexion, respectively, under an axial tibial load of 945 Newtons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9060502     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199703000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  [Alloarthroplasty versus above-knee amputation].

Authors:  K Daniilidis; E Jakubowitz; C Stukenborg-Colsman; T Calließ; H Windhagen; D Yao
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Enhancing the radiological classification system from the distal femur to the proximal tibia.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Matteo; Felipe Forero; Sophia-Marlene Busch; Philip Linke; Peter Wilhelm; Kristof Rademacher; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evaluation of stability of rotating hinge knee prostheses: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Joerg Friesenbichler; Andreas Leithner; Mathias Glehr; Patrick Sadoghi; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Alexander Avian; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-07-18

5.  A NEW APPROACH TO PARTIALKNEE ENDOPROSTHESIS IN PRIMARY BONE SARCOMAS.

Authors:  Valter Penna; Eduardo Areas Toller; Carla Pinheiro; Ricardo Gehrke Becker
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06

Review 6.  Total knee arthroplasty using hinge joints: Indications and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-04-25

Review 7.  Implant Survival, Clinical Outcome and Complications of Megaprosthetic Reconstructions Following Sarcoma Resection.

Authors:  Christoph Theil; Jan Schwarze; Georg Gosheger; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Niklas Deventer; Sebastian Klingebiel; George Grammatopoulos; Friedrich Boettner; Tom Schmidt-Braekling
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.