Literature DB >> 9059306

Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists.

A D Quinn1, C G Taylor, T Sabharwal, T Sikdar.   

Abstract

The outcome of teaching the core of knowledge to clinicians and the impact of the POPUMET regulations was assessed using an anonymous questionnaire. 82 of 120 (76%) of non-radiologists responded, of these 37% had attended a radiation protection course. Course attendance improved knowledge of the existence of the POPUMET regulations (p < 0.0001) and the ALARA principle. Course attendance made no difference to knowledge of the relative radiation dose of various radiological procedures. An underestimation of radiation dose was made by all responders (p < 0.001). The majority of responders were not aware that patients have no annual dose limit and the majority did not know the relative radiosensitivity of different organs. We have shown that despite the POPUMET regulations the majority of clinicians have not received adequate radiation protection teaching and that even if a course has been attended overall knowledge is still poor. We propose that formal compulsory teaching at undergraduate level may correct this in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9059306     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.70.829.9059306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  28 in total

Review 1.  Radiation exposure from radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: concerns and solutions.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Strategies for defining an optimal risk-benefit ratio for stress myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Vasken Dilsizian; Andrew J Einstein; Edward P Ficaro; Milena Henzlova; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Factors associated with reduced radiation exposure, cost, and technical difficulty of inferior vena cava filter placement and retrieval.

Authors:  Matthew Neill; Hearns W Charles; Daniel Pflager; Amy R Deipolyi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-01

4.  Current attitudes of Turkish anesthesiologists to radiation exposure.

Authors:  Adnan Tüfek; Orhan Tokgöz; Ilker Öngüç Aycan; Feyzi Çelik; Abdurrahman Gümüş
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Emergency physicians' attitudes and preferences regarding computed tomography, radiation exposure, and imaging decision support.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Donna B Jeffe; Thomas Bailey
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Radiation safety awareness among medical interns: are EU guidelines being implemented?

Authors:  A M Lee; M J Lee
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians.

Authors:  Karen E Thomas; June E Parnell-Parmley; Salwa Haidar; Rahim Moineddin; Ellen Charkot; Guila BenDavid; Connie Krajewski
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-05-13

8.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  An assessment of medical students' awareness of radiation exposures associated with diagnostic imaging investigations.

Authors:  Jennifer O'Sullivan; Owen J O'Connor; Kevin O'Regan; Bronagh Clarke; Louise N Burgoyne; Max F Ryan; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-03-03

10.  Effect of Structured Educational Program on Practices of Radiation Safety Measures Among Health Care Providers in Urology Operation Theater.

Authors:  Vijay Kumar; Atanu Kumar Pal; Sreerag Ks; Ramanitharan Manikandan; Lalgudi N Dorairajan; Sidhartha Kalra; Saravanan Kandasamy; Mujahid Khan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.