Literature DB >> 9059204

Cardiorespiratory changes during gynaecological laparoscopy by abdominal wall elevation: comparison with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.

A Casati1, G Valentini, S Ferrari, R Senatore, A Zangrillo, G Torri.   

Abstract

We have studied the cardiorespiratory changes produced by abdominal wall elevation (AWE) or carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum (PN) in 20 women undergoing gynaecological laparoscopy. Arterial pressure, heart rate, lung/chest complicance and blood-gas tensions were measured 10 min after induction of general anaesthesia (T0), 10 min after abdominal distension in the supine position (T1) and 10 min after the Trendelenburg position was assumed (T2). Visual analogue scores for pain were recorded 1 and 6 h after the end of surgery. We found that lung/chest compliance was reduced significantly in group PN at T1 and T2 compared with both T0 and group AWE. Diastolic arterial pressure increased significantly in group PN at T1 and T2 compared with both T0 and group AWE, while it remained unchanged in group AWE. Arterial PCO2 increased significantly only in group PN after pneumoperitoneum, while oxygenation was almost unchanged in both groups. AWE patients had greater abdominal pain 1 h after surgery. Six hours after surgery pain was similar in the two groups. These data indicate that abdominal wall elevation reduced pulmonary compliance less than a pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9059204     DOI: 10.1093/bja/78.1.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  8 in total

1.  Management of benign ovarian cysts by a novel, gasless, single-incision laparoscopic technique: keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery (KARS).

Authors:  Kahraman Ülker; Ürfettin Hüseyinoğlu; Nergiz Kılıç
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Compliance of the abdominal wall during laparoscopic insufflation.

Authors:  Chuck Becker; Margaret A Plymale; John Wennergren; Crystal Totten; Kyle Stigall; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Changes in cuff pressure of endotracheal tube during laparoscopic and open abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Zeynep Baysal Yildirim; Ali Uzunkoy; Ali Cigdem; Suleyman Ganidagli; Abdullah Ozgonul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of valve-less vs. standard insufflation on pneumoperitoneum volume, inflammation, and peritoneal physiology in a laparoscopic sigmoid resection experimental model.

Authors:  Michele Diana; Eric Noll; Andras Legnèr; Seong-Ho Kong; Yu-Yin Liu; Luigi Schiraldi; Francesco Marchegiani; Jordan Bano; Bernard Geny; Anne-Laure Charles; Bernard Dallemagne; Véronique Lindner; Didier Mutter; Pierre Diemunsch; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopy is safe among patients with congestive heart failure undergoing general surgery procedures.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Asvin M Ganapathi; Brian R Englum; Steven N Vaslef
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Hemodynamic stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Effect of two different doses of intravenous clonidine premedication.

Authors:  Deepshikha C Tripathi; Komal S Shah; Santosh R Dubey; Shilpa M Doshi; Punit V Raval
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10

7.  Comparison of tubal sterilization procedures performed by keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery and conventional CO2 laparoscopy: a case controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Kahraman Ülker; Urfettin Hüseyinoğlu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-24

8.  Combined spinal and general anesthesia is better than general anesthesia alone for laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Poonam S Ghodki; Shalini P Sardesai; Ramesh W Naphade
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.