Literature DB >> 9058338

Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible.

D L Cochran1, J S Hermann, R K Schenk, F L Higginbottom, D Buser.   

Abstract

The use of endosseous dental implants as transmucosal devices necessitates the successful integration of three different tissues: bone, connective tissue, and epithelium. So far, studies have predominantly focused on hard tissue integration. Much less is known about soft tissues. This study examined the dimensions of the implantogingival junction in relation to clinically healthy unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants. In total, 69 titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) and sandblasted acid-etched (SLA) implants were placed in an alternating fashion in six foxhounds and allowed to heal for 3 months. Two dogs were sacrificed after the initial healing period. The remaining four dogs had crowns fabricated that were allowed to function for up to 12 months. These animals were sacrificed after 3 and 12 months of loading. Histometric analysis of undecalcified histologic sections included the evaluation of the sulcus depth (SD), the dimensions of the junctional epithelium (JE), and the connective tissue contact (CTC). Mean values in the 3 month unloaded group were 0.49 mm for SD, 1.16 mm for JE, and 1.36 mm for CTC. These dimensions were 0.50 mm for SD, 1.44 mm for JE, and 1.01 mm for CTC for the 3 month loaded group. After 12 months of loading, these values were 0.16 mm for SD, 1.88 mm for JE, and 1.05 mm for CTC. The sum of these measurements was similar for the different time points and similar to the same dimensions around teeth. TPS and SLA surfaces had no influence on the evaluated parameters (P > 0.05). The data suggest that a biologic width exists around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged one-part titanium implants and that this is a physiologically formed and stable dimension as is found around teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9058338     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  26 in total

1.  Distance between implants has a potential impact of crestal bone resorption.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Ilaria Zollino; Anna Avantaggiato; Alessandra Lucchese; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-02-19

2.  Resorption of labial bone in maxillary anterior implant.

Authors:  Young-Bum Cho; Seung-Jin Moon; Chae-Heon Chung; Hee-Jung Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 3.  Epithelial integrins with special reference to oral epithelia.

Authors:  H Larjava; L Koivisto; L Häkkinen; J Heino
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  A proof of concept gene-activated titanium surface for oral implantology applications.

Authors:  Noah Z Laird; Walla I Malkawi; Jaidev L Chakka; Timothy M Acri; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 5.  Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Valles; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Marco Clementini; Mariana Baglivo; Blanca Paniagua; Jose Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Premature exposure of dental implant cover screws. A retrospective evaluation of risk factors and influence on marginal peri-implant bone level changes.

Authors:  Moritz Hertel; Yun-Chie Roh; Konrad Neumann; Frank Peter Strietzel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Immediate definitive individualized abutments reduce peri-implant bone loss: a randomized controlled split-mouth study on 16 patients.

Authors:  M Erhan Çömlekoğlu; Nejat Nizam; Mine Dündar Çömlekoğlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  What is the effect of initial implant position on the crestal bone level in flap and flapless technique during healing period?

Authors:  Mohammed Jasim Al-Juboori; Shaifulizan Ab Rahman; Akram Hassan; Ikmal Hisham Bin Ismail; Omar Farouq Tawfiq
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  Morphology, proliferation, and gene expression of gingival fibroblasts on Laser-Lok, titanium, and zirconia surfaces.

Authors:  Nasrin Esfahanizadeh; Sara Motalebi; Niloufar Daneshparvar; Nasrin Akhoundi; Shahin Bonakdar
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early subepithelial connective tissue attachment at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants. A pilot study in dogs.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Monika Herten; Martin Sager; Marco Wieland; Michel Dard; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.