Literature DB >> 9058117

Laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy: a comparative study.

B Delaitre1, J Pitre.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In 1993, we reported a new technique for laparoscopic splenectomy, namely the "hanging spleen" technique. The patient was placed in a right lateral supine position with the operator being located on the right of the patient. We herein report the results of 28 laparoscopic splenectomies performed with this technique until January 1996.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1993 to 1996, the results were compared with those of 28 patients operated on by open splenectomy from 1988 to 1995. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex-ratio, and physical condition (ASA classification). Indications for splenectomy were the following in each group: idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (n = 26 and 27, respectively) and hemolytic anemia (n = 2 and 1, respectively).
RESULTS: Accessory spleens were found in 3 patients of the laparoscopic group and in 5 patients of the open group. Three conversions to open procedure were necessary in the laparoscopic group, but two conversions might have been avoided. We have observed significant advantages in the laparoscopic approach: shorter ileus and postoperative stay. On the other hand, the procedure was longer than with open splenectomies. Three patients had postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group, whereas nine patients had complications in the open group. Recurrence of ITP was observed in 2 patients of the laparoscopic group and in 4 patients of the open group.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that laparoscopic splenectomy may be considered as a safe alternative to open splenectomy in patients with hematological diseases such as ITP and hemolytic anemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9058117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for a giant splenic epidermoid cyst: report of a case.

Authors:  Y Sakamoto; S Yunotani; G Edakuni; M Mori; A Iyama; K Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  A meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological disorders.

Authors:  Yan-Nan Bai; Hui Jiang; Pankaj Prasoon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy.

Authors:  Hakan Bulus; Hatim Mahmoud; Hasan Altun; Adnan Tas; Kaan Karayalcin
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-12-26

4.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  B Habermalz; S Sauerland; G Decker; B Delaitre; J-F Gigot; E Leandros; K Lechner; M Rhodes; G Silecchia; A Szold; E Targarona; P Torelli; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Hematological long-term results of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a case control study.

Authors:  F J Berends; N Schep; M A Cuesta; H J Bonjer; M C Kappers-Klunne; P Huijgens; G Kazemier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Analysis of the surgical treatment of the patients operated on by using laparoscopic and classic splenectomy due to benign disorders of the spleen.

Authors:  Vladimir Milosavljevic; Boris Tadic; Nikola Grubor; Dragan Eric; Milorad Reljic; Slavko Matic
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-06-13

7.  Laparoscopic splenectomy of a wandering spleen with coincidental enormous splenomegaly.

Authors:  Johannes Lemke; Jan Scheele; Markus Juchems; Doris Henne-Bruns; Claas Brockschmidt
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2012-12-03

8.  Surgery for massive splenomegaly.

Authors:  J Lemaire; A Rosière; C Bertrand; B Bihin; J E Donckier; L A Michel
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2017-04-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.