Literature DB >> 9057541

Sonography of normal cranial sutures.

D Soboleski1, D McCloskey, B Mussari, E Sauerbrei, M Clarke, A Fletcher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the normal sonographic appearance and measurement of normal major cranial sutures in neonates and infants. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: High-resolution sonograms of sagittal, coronal, and lambdoid sutures were obtained for two autopsy specimens and correlated with histologic sections obtained at identical locations. Also, 50 neonates and infants (0-5 months old [corrected age]) who had normally shaped craniums underwent sonography of the brain that produced normal findings. These neonates and infants also underwent sutural sonograms. The width and thickness of each of the major cranial sutures (sagittal, coronal, and lambdoid) were measured, with mean values established. Measurements were analyzed with paired t tests for interobserver variability. Linear regression was used for correlation of measurements with age.
RESULTS: With a scan plane perpendicular to the suture line, sonograms revealed sutures as hypoechoic gaps between two hyperechoic bony plates. On sonograms, sagittal sutures had an end-to-end appearance instead of the beveled junction seen throughout most of the coronal and lambdoid sutures. In the 50 patients, sonograms revealed the mean width to be 0.89 +/- 0.35 mm (mean +/- SD) for coronal sutures. 0.93 +/- 0.28 mm for sagittal sutures, and 0.96 +/- 0.39 mm for lambdoid sutures. On sonograms, mean thickness was 1.97 +/- 0.54 mm for coronal sutures, 1.88 +/- 0.56 mm for sagittal sutures, and 2.49 +/- 0.86 mm for lambdoid sutures. We found no interobserver variability (p < or = .05). With linear regression analysis, we found no correlation between suture width or thickness and patient age (r = .01).
CONCLUSION: In our study, high-resolution sonography proved to be a reliable and inexpensive technique capable of defining cranial sutures. Preliminary normative data obtained for cranial suture width and thickness showed no correlation with age in our population group. The normative data obtained will allow recognition of abnormal sutures, particularly synostotic or diastatic sutures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9057541     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  15 in total

1.  Cranial suture simulator for ultrasound diagnosis of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Anh-Vu Ngo; Raymond W Sze; Marguerite T Parisi; Manrita Sidhu; Angelisa M Paladin; Ed Weinberger; Kristy D Seidel; Michael L Cunningham
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-04-23

2.  Effectiveness of screening for craniosynostosis with ultrasound: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Kent M Hall; David A Besachio; Matthew D Moore; Adrian J Mora; William R Carter
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17

3.  Centile charts for cranial sutures in children younger than 1 year based on ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Katya Rozovsky; Nicholas James Barrowman; Elka Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-01-06

4.  Avoiding CT scans in children with single-suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  T Schweitzer; H Böhm; P Meyer-Marcotty; H Collmann; R-I Ernestus; J Krauß
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Normal sagittal and coronal suture widths by using CT imaging.

Authors:  L A Mitchell; C A Kitley; T L Armitage; M V Krasnokutsky; V J Rooks
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Cranial ultrasound is a reliable first step imaging in children with suspected craniosynostosis.

Authors:  L Pogliani; G V Zuccotti; M Furlanetto; V Giudici; A Erbetta; L Chiapparini; L Valentini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Ultrasound screening of the lambdoid suture in the child with posterior plagiocephaly.

Authors:  Raymond W Sze; Marguerite T Parisi; Manrita Sidhu; Angelisa M Paladin; Anh-Vu Ngo; Kristy D Seidel; Ed Weinberger; Richard G Ellenbogen; Joseph S Gruss; Michael L Cunningham
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-07-18

8.  Effectiveness of ultrasonographic evaluation of the cranial sutures in children with suspected craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Natalia Simanovsky; Nurith Hiller; Benjamin Koplewitz; Katya Rozovsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The effects of micro-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) on the nasomaxillary complex--a finite element method (FEM) analysis.

Authors:  Matt MacGinnis; Howard Chu; George Youssef; Kimberley W Wu; Andre Wilson Machado; Won Moon
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 10.  Craniosynostosis: imaging review and primer on computed tomography.

Authors:  Chaitra A Badve; Mallikarjunappa M K; Ramesh S Iyer; Gisele E Ishak; Paritosh C Khanna
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.