Literature DB >> 9057435

Endometrial pipelle biopsy compared to conventional dilatation and curettage.

S Ong1, T Duffy, P Lenehan, J Murphy.   

Abstract

Dilatation and curettage (D + C) is the most common operation performed in Britain. The liberal use of D + C has been criticised. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of outpatient endometrial pipelle biopsy and determine its safety in terms of detecting abnormalities. Complications and financial costs were also evaluated. Data were reviewed from an active gynaecological unit from February 1993 to January 1995. A total of 303 D + Cs and 104 endometrial pipelle biopsies were performed in this period. Nine malignancies were detected by D + C and 1 by pipelle biopsy. A total of 24 and 3 benign abnormalities were detected by each method respectively. There was a higher complication rate in the D + C group but the failure rate was higher in the endometrial pipelle biopsy group. The monetary savings over this period is estimated at 20,307 pounds. There were no missed malignancies to our knowledge over the 8 yr period since endometrial pipelle biopsy was introduced to the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9057435     DOI: 10.1007/bf02939779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  10 in total

1.  Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  T G Stovall; G J Photopulos; W M Poston; F W Ling; L G Sandles
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Diagnostic role of dilatation and curettage in the management of abnormal premenopausal bleeding.

Authors:  R H Hammond; L W Oppenheimer; P G Saunders
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-04

3.  Current dilatation and curettage practice: a need for revision.

Authors:  J J Smith; H Schulman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The Pipelle: a disposable device for endometrial biopsy.

Authors:  E Cornier
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Diagnostic dilation and curettage: a reappraisal.

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The efficacy of the pipelle endometrial biopsy in detecting endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  J Ferry; A Farnsworth; M Webster; B Wren
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.100

7.  Abnormal uterine bleeding and cancer of the genital tract.

Authors:  D G Allen; J F Correy; D E Marsden
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.100

8.  Diagnostic dilatation and curettage: is it used appropriately?

Authors:  A Coulter; A Klassen; I Z MacKenzie; K McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-23

Review 9.  Endometrial carcinoma in women 40 years of age or younger.

Authors:  J D Crissman; R S Azoury; A E Barnes; H F Schellhas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Critical assessment of dilatation and curettage in 1029 women.

Authors:  I Z MacKenzie; J G Bibby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.