Literature DB >> 9057294

Analysis of population structure of cactophilic yeast from the genus Pichia: P. cactophila and P. norvegensis.

P F Ganter1, B Quarles.   

Abstract

DNAs from 40 strains of Pichia cactophila and Pichia norvegensis, yeasts characteristic of cactus necroses, were compared using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) banding patterns and killer/sensitive phenotypes. Both species belong to the same species complex within the genus. The levels of between-strain RAPD variation were high in both species (higher in the automictic P. cactophila than in the heterothallic P. norvegensis), although there is little variation in physiological abilities within either species. Although each species was a separate lineage, RAPD analysis confirms that the species are related. Within each species, RAPD variation was related to the geographic origin of the strains. Pichia cactophila strains from southern Florida were more related to those from Antigua than to those from northern Florida. These results correlated well with the differences among killer/sensitive phenotypes of strains. Principal component analysis indicated that the phenotypes of each species differ. Here too, strains from southern Florida were more similar to those from Antigua than to those from northern Florida. Previous work had identified differences in the cactophilic yeast communities from southern and northern Florida, and these results indicate that the differences are detectable at the population levels as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9057294     DOI: 10.1139/m97-006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  2 in total

1.  Pichia insulana sp. nov., a novel cactophilic yeast from the Caribbean.

Authors:  Philip F Ganter; Gianluigi Cardinali; Kyria Boundy-Mills
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Isolation and characterization of yeasts from fermented apple bagasse as additives for ruminant feeding.

Authors:  Y Castillo-Castillo; O Ruiz-Barrera; M E Burrola-Barraza; Y Marrero-Rodriguez; J Salinas-Chavira; C Angulo-Montoya; A Corral-Luna; C Arzola-Alvarez; M Itza-Ortiz; J Camarillo
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.476

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.