Literature DB >> 9057146

Repair of five distal radius fractures with an investigational cancellous bone cement: a preliminary report.

J B Jupiter1, S Winters, S Sigman, C Lowe, C Pappas, A L Ladd, M Van Wagoner, S T Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of Norian SRS bone cement injected percutaneously into a distal radius following reduction in both preventing loss of reduction as well as safety.
DESIGN: The study was a prospective clinical study with an established protocol.
SETTING: The study was conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital following approval of the institutions Investigational Review Board. All patients were required to read and approve an informed consent document. PATIENTS: While twenty patients' radiographs fulfilled the requirement of a dorsally displaced extraarticular fracture to have occurred within 72 hours of presentation, only five consented to participate fully and one voluntarily withdrew after a six-month follow-up. INTERVENTION: All fractures were reduced under regional or general anesthesia, and the Norian SRS was introduced via a catheter system into the metaphyseal defect of the fracture. A short arm cast was applied and remained in place for six weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiographic parameters of fracture reduction were measured prospectively by an independent radiologist throughout the 12 months of the study. Clinical parameters of hand and wrist function were measured prospectively by an independent occupational therapist.
RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, radial length was a mean 9.9 mm with an average loss of < 1 mm; radial angle maintained at a mean 25.4 degrees; volar angle was within normal range (0-21 degrees) in 4; and 1 patient had a dorsal angle of 7 degrees. Wrist motion improved 50 percent between 6 weeks and 3 months and improved further by 12 months when grip strength reached a mean of 88 percent of the contralateral side. Dorsal and volar extrusion of injected Norian SRS in 4 patients resorbed over time. There were no clinically significant adverse effects or complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Norian SRS proved to be clinically safe and effective as a cancellous bone cement to maintain fracture reduction of unstable extraarticular distal radius fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9057146     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199702000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  10 in total

1.  Synthesis, material properties, and biocompatibility of a novel self-cross-linkable poly(caprolactone fumarate) as an injectable tissue engineering scaffold.

Authors:  Esmaiel Jabbari; Shanfeng Wang; Lichun Lu; James A Gruetzmacher; Syed Ameenuddin; Theresa E Hefferan; Bradford L Currier; Anthony J Windebank; Michael J Yaszemski
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 2.  Biomaterial scaffolds for treating osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Julie A Sterling; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Internal fixation of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  David L Rothberg; Mark A Lee
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Bioactive glass granules: a suitable bone substitute material in the operative treatment of depressed lateral tibial plateau fractures: a prospective, randomized 1 year follow-up study.

Authors:  Jouni T Heikkilä; Juha Kukkonen; Allan J Aho; Susanna Moisander; Timo Kyyrönen; Kimmo Mattila
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  [Use of the injectable bone cement Norian SRS for tibial plateau fractures. Results of a prospective 30-month follow-up study].

Authors:  A Jubel; J Andermahr; J Mairhofer; A Prokop; U Hahn; K E Rehm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Promontory of radius: a new anatomical description on the distal radius.

Authors:  G Windisch; H Clement; K Tanzer; G Feigl; W Grechenig; F Anderhuber; W Pichler
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Simon Young; Leda Klouda; Mark Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 8.  Tissue engineering of bone: the reconstructive surgeon's point of view.

Authors:  U Kneser; D J Schaefer; E Polykandriotis; R E Horch
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 9.  An osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic tissue-engineered product for trauma and orthopaedic surgery: how far are we?

Authors:  Wasim S Khan; Faizal Rayan; Baljinder S Dhinsa; David Marsh
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  Clinical impact of high-profile animal-based research reported in the UK national press.

Authors:  Jarrod Bailey; Michael Balls
Journal:  BMJ Open Sci       Date:  2020-10-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.