Literature DB >> 9056806

The rationing debate. Defining a package in healthcare services the NHS is responsible for. The case against.

R Klein1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1997        PMID： 9056806      PMCID： PMC2125987          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Rationing in medicine from the economic viewpoint].

Authors:  K Obermann
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-02-15

2.  The prioritization preferences of pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review members and the Canadian public: a stated-preferences comparison.

Authors:  C Skedgel
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  The Relative Importance of Clinical, Economic, Patient Values and Feasibility Criteria in Cancer Drug Reimbursement in Canada: A Revealed Preferences Analysis of Recommendations of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review 2011-2017.

Authors:  Chris Skedgel; Dominika Wranik; Min Hu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Rationing in health systems: A critical review.

Authors:  Iman Keliddar; Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad; Mehdi Jafari-Sirizi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-08-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.