Literature DB >> 9055297

Role of nitric oxide in cutaneous blood flow increases in the rat hindpaw during dorsal column stimulation.

J E Croom1, R D Foreman, M J Chandler, M C Koss, K W Barron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Dorsal column stimulation (DCS) increases blood flow to the extremities and may produce a limb-saving effect in addition to treatment of refractory chronic pain in patients with peripheral vascular disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of nitric oxide in cutaneous vasodilation caused by DCS.
METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). A unipolar ball electrode was placed on the left-side of the exposed spinal cord at approximately L1-L2. Blood flow was concurrently recorded from both hindpaw foot pads with laser doppler flowmeters. Blood flow responses were assessed during 1 minute of DCS (0.6 mA at 50 Hz, 0.2-ms pulse) at 10-minute intervals. Nitric oxide synthase was inhibited with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Four groups of animals were examined. The first and second groups involved examination of the effects of DCS after 2 and 10 mg/kg L-NAME, respectively. In the third group, the effect of another nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (10 mg/kg), was examined on the responses to DCS. The fourth group of animals entailed comparison of the effects of DCS under control conditions, after the nicotinic receptor antagonist, hexamethonium (10 mg/kg), and during the combined presence of hexamethonium and L-NAME (10 mg/kg).
RESULTS: L-NAME markedly attenuated the cutaneous blood flow increases caused by DCS at doses of 2 or 10 mg/kg. Similarly, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine also attenuated the DCS response. Hexamethonium did not affect the cutaneous vasodilation caused by DCS. After hexamethonium, L-NAME no longer attenuated the DCS response.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that nitric oxide played a significant role in producing the DCS-induced increase in rat cutaneous hindpaw blood flow. The involvement of nitric oxide does not require the presence of autonomic efferent function; however, ganglionic blockade may unmask a mechanism for vasodilation during DCS that is independent of nitric oxide release.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9055297     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199703000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  Treatment of digit ulcers in a patient with Buerger's disease by using cervical spinal cord stimulation -a case report-.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Ryu; Hee-Jung Jeon; Sam-Soon Cho; Rak-Min Choi; Jin-Sun Yoon; Hong-Seok Ko; Jae-Do Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-08-27

Review 2.  Recent advances: control of chronic pain.

Authors:  T J Nurmikko; T P Nash; J R Wiles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-21

3.  Spinal cord stimulation ameliorates detrusor over-activity and visceromotor pain responses in rats with cystitis.

Authors:  Huiyi H Chang; Jih-Chao Yeh; Jackie Mao; David A Ginsberg; Gamal Ghoniem; Larissa V Rodriguez
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (AKT) pathways involved in spinal cord stimulation (SCS)-induced vasodilation.

Authors:  Mingyuan Wu; Naoka Komori; Chao Qin; Jay P Farber; Bengt Linderoth; Robert D Foreman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Putative mechanisms behind effects of spinal cord stimulation on vascular diseases: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Mingyuan Wu; Bengt Linderoth; Robert D Foreman
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.145

6.  Roles of peripheral terminals of transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 containing sensory fibers in spinal cord stimulation-induced peripheral vasodilation.

Authors:  Mingyuan Wu; Naoka Komori; Chao Qin; Jay P Farber; Bengt Linderoth; Robert D Foreman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 3.252

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.