Literature DB >> 9054902

Barriers to the diagnosis of depression in primary care.

J P Docherty1.   

Abstract

Approximately 50% of people treated for depression receive treatment in primary care settings. However, studies have demonstrated that specific factors interfere with recognition of this disorder in the primary care setting and decrease the likelihood of an accurate diagnosis. Variables that relate to the patient include lack of awareness and understanding of the nature of the disease and its symptoms so that they can be accurately reported to the physician. Variability in clinical presentation and the presence of comorbid medical disorders also make detection difficult. Complaints of physical symptoms confuse the clinical picture. In addition, patients are ashamed to admit to psychological symptoms of depression and fear the stigma attached to it. Interfering factors that relate to the physician include a lack of knowledge about the disease and lack of training in its management that reduce the physician's ability to render a diagnosis and undermine confidence in the capacity to treat the illness successfully. Reluctance on the part of the physician to inquire frankly about depression also plays a role. Barriers that stem from the system include financing of care under capitated systems, other reimbursement issues, time available to care for patients, and continuity of the physician/patient relationship. A variety of tools are available to assist primary care physicians in the recognition and accurate diagnosis of depression. Use of these tools would increase the recognition and effective management of depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9054902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  38 in total

1.  "Patient knows best"-detection of common mental disorders in Santiago, Chile: cross sectional study.

Authors:  R Araya; G H Lewis; G Rojas; A H Mann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

Review 2.  Integrated primary mental health care: threat or opportunity in the new NHS?

Authors:  Helen Lester; Jon Glasby; André Tylee
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Health Outcomes in Individuals with Problem and Pathological Gambling: An Analysis of the 2014 North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Survey System (BRFSS).

Authors:  Ryan Van Patten; Jeremiah Weinstock; Andrew B McGrath
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-03

4.  Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners and recognition of depression in primary care.

Authors:  Andrew Martyn Thornett; Ruth M Pickering; Tracy Willis; Chris Thompson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Detection of postpartum depression and anxiety in a large health plan.

Authors:  Ashley O Coates; Catherine A Schaefer; Jeanne L Alexander
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.505

6.  Minor depression and rehabilitation outcome for older adults in subacute care.

Authors:  Bradley P Allen; Zia Agha; Edmund H Duthie; Peter M Layde
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  Perspectives of family physicians on computer-assisted health-risk assessments.

Authors:  Farah Ahmad; Harvey A Skinner; Donna E Stewart; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Ethnic Differences in Prevalence of Post-stroke Depression.

Authors:  Liming Dong; Brisa N Sánchez; Lesli E Skolarus; Lewis B Morgenstern; Lynda D Lisabeth
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-02

9.  Barriers in recognising, diagnosing and managing depressive and anxiety disorders as experienced by Family Physicians; a focus group study.

Authors:  Eric van Rijswijk; Hein van Hout; Eloy van de Lisdonk; Frans Zitman; Chris van Weel
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Psychoeducation for depression, anxiety and psychological distress: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara Donker; Kathleen M Griffiths; Pim Cuijpers; Helen Christensen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.