Literature DB >> 9054744

Outcome of reoperative coronary bypass surgery versus coronary angioplasty after previous bypass surgery.

W S Weintraub1, E L Jones, D C Morris, S B King, R A Guyton, J M Craver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The immediate and long-term outcomes of reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) (n = 1561) and catheter-based coronary intervention (angioplasty) (n = 2613) were compared in patients from Emory University Hospitals who had previous CABG. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The surgical and angioplasty procedures and statistical methods were standard. Data were collected prospectively and entered into a computerized database. Followup was by letter, telephone, or additional events resulting in readmission. In the angioplasty group, 2.9% required in-hospital CABG. Hospital mortality was 1.2% after angioplasty versus 6.8% after repeat CABG (P < .0001). Recurrent angina was noted frequently at about 4 years and was more common after angioplasty. One-, 5-, and 10-year mortalities were 11%, 24%, and 49% after CABG versus 6%, 22%, and 38% after angioplasty. Survival corrected for baseline differences did not vary with the choice of procedure. There were more additional procedures after angioplasty. Patients undergoing angioplasty may be divided into those with procedures only in native coronary arteries (n = 1545), only in vein grafts (n = 869), and a mixture (n = 199), with respective 10 year survivals of 66%, 56%, and 65% (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: These patients have a high incidence of events both in-hospital and in the long term. Although initial mortality was higher after CABG, after baseline differences were accounted for, there was no difference in the long term. Patients more frequently have additional procedures after angioplasty. Choice of therapy should consider clinical and angiographic suitability and patient preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9054744     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.95.4.868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

1.  Extensive deendothelialization and thrombogenicity in routinely prepared vein grafts for coronary bypass operations: facts and remedy.

Authors:  Dominik R Weiss; Gerd Juchem; Bernhard M Kemkes; Brigitte Gansera; Stephan Nees
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-05-28

2.  Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting using a minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedure.

Authors:  T Ueda; T Kawata; K Mizuguchi; T Tsuji; N Tabayashi; T Abe; H Naito; K Nezu; S Taniguchi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-10

3.  Predictors of periprocedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions within coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Rafał A Januszek; Artur Dziewierz; Zbigniew Siudak; Tomasz Rakowski; Dariusz Dudek; Stanisław Bartuś
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.737

4.  Coronary reoperation with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  S M Tugtekin; K Alexiou; U Kappert; H Esche; D Joskowiak; M Knaut; K Matschke
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for people with stable angina or acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  A Bakhai; R A Hill; Y Dundar; R Dickson; T Walley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

6.  Patient-Specific Simulations Reveal Significant Differences in Mechanical Stimuli in Venous and Arterial Coronary Grafts.

Authors:  Abhay B Ramachandra; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Hemodynamic analysis of sequential graft from right coronary system to left coronary system.

Authors:  Wenxin Wang; Boyan Mao; Haoran Wang; Xueying Geng; Xi Zhao; Huixia Zhang; Jinsheng Xie; Zhou Zhao; Bo Lian; Youjun Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on saphenous vein graft and native coronary vessels.

Authors:  Mohammad Alidoosti; Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini; Ahmad Sharafi; Ebrahim Nematipour; Mojtaba Salarifar; Hamidreza Poorhoseini; Seyed Ebrahim Kassaian; Ali Mohammad Haji Zeinali; Alireza Amirzadegan; Mohammad Sadeghian; Masoumeh Lotfi-Tokalday
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2011-08-31

9.  Low Wall Shear Stress Is Associated with Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Muhammad Owais Khan; Justin S Tran; Han Zhu; Jack Boyd; René R Sevag Packard; Ronald P Karlsberg; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Rotablation in the treatment of high-risk patients with heavily calcified left-main coronary lesions.

Authors:  Meng-Hsiu Chiang; Hung-Tao Yi; Cheng-Rong Tsao; Wei-Chun Chang; Chieh-Shou Su; Tsun-Jui Liu; Kae-Woei Liang; Chih-Tai Ting; Wen-Lieng Lee
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.