Literature DB >> 9054286

Early detection of prostate cancer. Part I: Prior probability and effectiveness of tests. The American College of Physicians.

C M Coley1, M J Barry, C Fleming, A G Mulley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of clinically important prostate cancer and to evaluate the effectiveness of digital rectal examination and measurement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in early detection of prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES: Relevant studies were identified from a structured MEDLINE search (1966 to 1995), reviews, bibliographies of retrieved articles, author files, and abstracts. STUDY SELECTION: Articles selected for analysis of test effectiveness were prospective cohort studies of early detection that did not have obvious selection bias. DATA EXTRACTION: Likelihood ratios for digital rectal examination and PSA measurement were estimated from studies that specified the age distribution of participants. DATA SYNTHESIS: In patients who have abnormalities on digital rectal examination, the risk for a large intracapsular tumor is increased twofold but the risk for extracapsular disease is increased threefold to ninefold. An elevation in PSA level greater than 4 ng/mL increases the odds of intracapsular tumors by as much as threefold and the odds of extracapsular tumors by threefold to fivefold. For studies in which biopsies were done if results of either test were abnormal, 18% to 26% of screened patients had suspicious results, cancer detection rates were approximately 4%, and the positive predictive value of the tests combined was 15% to 21%. Men who have lower urinary tract symptoms that are consistent with benign prostatic hyperplasia are not more likely to harbor prostate cancer; the specificity of PSA measurement is considerably lower among these men.
CONCLUSIONS: Larger-volume tumors of the prostate are common among older men. Available tests for the early detection of cancer have limited specificity, which necessitates a relatively high biopsy rate. The positive predictive value of combined digital rectal examination and PSA measurement has been defined, but the negative predictive value is less clear. Measurement of PSA is the most sensitive noninvasive test for prostate cancer. However, digital rectal examination detects cancer that would otherwise be missed by PSA measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9054286     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  36 in total

1.  Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico.

Authors:  C J Herman; R M Hoffman; K K Altobelli
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-08

2.  Brief report: physicians and their personal prostate cancer-screening practices with prostate-specific antigen. A national survey.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Michael J Barry; Sally W Vernon; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  S R Gambert
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  The significance of quality of life in health care.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  A population-based survey of prostate cancer testing in New Mexico.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; F D Gilliland
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-12

Review 6.  Prostate cancer: 4. Screening.

Authors:  F Meyer; Y Fradet
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Mazhar; J Waxman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chikezie O Madu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Sally W Vernon; Frederick T O'Donnell; Chul Ahn; Anthony Greisinger; Donnie W Aga
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Sensitivity study and optimization of a 3D electric impedance tomography prostate probe.

Authors:  A Borsic; R Halter; Y Wan; A Hartov; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.833

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.