Literature DB >> 9054279

Clinical efficacy of monotherapy with stavudine compared with zidovudine in HIV-infected, zidovudine-experienced patients. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Bristol-Myers Squibb Stavudine/019 Study Group.

S L Spruance1, A T Pavia, J W Mellors, R Murphy, J Gathe, E Stool, J G Jemsek, P Dellamonica, A Cross, L Dunkle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stavudine is a promising antiretroviral agent, but its clinical efficacy has not been determined.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effect of stavudine (2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine) monotherapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.
SETTING: 56 outpatient clinics in private practices, universities, and contract research organizations in the United States, France, and Italy. PATIENTS: 822 HIV-infected adults who had 50 to 500 CD4+ cells/mm3 and had previously received at least 6 months of zidovudine treatment. INTERVENTION: Monotherapy with peroral stavudine capsules or peroral zidovudine capsules. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was clinical progression, which was defined as all occurrences of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining events or death.
RESULTS: Patients receiving stavudine reached clinical end points at a rate of 26 per 100 person-years, compared with 32 per 100 person-years for patients receiving zidovudine (relative risk, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.98]; P = 0.03). The risk for death alone was 26% lower in the stavudine group than in the zidovudine group, but the comparison was not statistically significant (relative risk, 0.74 [CI, 0.53 to 1.02]; P = 0.066). The benefit of stavudine therapy was seen in all CD4+ cell strata (< or = 100 cells/mm3, 101 to 300 cells/mm3, and > 300 cells/mm3) and clinical stages of HIV disease (asymptomatic, symptomatic, and AIDS). Four weeks after treatment began, CD4+ cell counts were 30 cells/mm3 higher in the stavudine group than in the zidovudine group; this difference was sustained for 96 weeks (P < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting were more common in patients receiving zidovudine (P < 0.01), and neuropathy occurred more frequently in those receiving stavudine (12% in the stavudine group compared with 4% in the zidovudine group; P < 0.001). Neuropathy resolved completely in many patients (63%) after interruption of stavudine treatment; these patients could resume stavudine therapy at a lower dose.
CONCLUSIONS: Stavudine was well tolerated and delayed progression of HIV disease in patients who had previously received 6 or more months of zidovudine treatment. Benefits were apparent in all CD4+ cell strata and clinical stages of HIV disease. Stavudine is an important agent to consider for trials of combination chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9054279     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  14 in total

Review 1.  Stavudine: an update of its use in the treatment of HIV infection.

Authors:  M Hurst; S Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of stavudine.

Authors:  K Z Rana; M N Dudley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Protease inhibitors as antiviral agents.

Authors:  A K Patick; K E Potts
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection. A knowledge-based approach to drug selection and use.

Authors:  G J Moyle; B G Gazzard; D A Cooper; J Gatell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A potential event-competition bias in safety signal detection: results from a spontaneous reporting research database in France.

Authors:  Francesco Salvo; Florent Leborgne; Frantz Thiessard; Nicholas Moore; Bernard Bégaud; Antoine Pariente
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  A risk-benefit assessment of HIV protease inhibitors.

Authors:  G J Moyle; B G Gazzard
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Practical issues regarding the use of antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection.

Authors:  S G Deeks
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-02

8.  Determination of dosing guidelines for stavudine (2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine) in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  S Kaul; M W Kline; J A Church; L M Dunkle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Estimation of intracellular concentration of stavudine triphosphate in HIV-infected children given a reduced dose of 0.5 milligrams per kilogram twice daily.

Authors:  Sherwin K B Sy; Steve Innes; Hartmut Derendorf; Mark F Cotton; Bernd Rosenkranz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Peripheral neuropathy with nucleoside antiretrovirals: risk factors, incidence and management.

Authors:  G J Moyle; M Sadler
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.